Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A retrospective multi-center cohort study investigating safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy for axillary staging in clinical T3-4c breast cancer

  • Sayaka Kuba
  • , Yasuaki Sagara
  • , Hiroshi Yano
  • , Shigeto Maeda
  • , Takehiko Sakai
  • , Yasuyuki Kojima
  • , Masaya Hattori
  • , Sota Asaga
  • , Eriko Tokunaga
  • , Tadahiko Shien
  • , Hiroko Bando
  • , Keisei Anan
  • , Nobutaka Iwakuma
  • , Shigeki Minami
  • , Miki Yamaguchi
  • , Michiko Harao
  • , Masahiro Oikawa
  • , Takafumi Sangai
  • , Makoto Ishitobi
  • , Takahiro Nakayama
  • Tetsu Hayashida, Manami Tada, Kentaro Tamaki, Goro Kutomi, Mai Tomiguchi, Narumi Harada-Shoji, Kaname Kurashita, Kaori Terata, Kosho Yamanouchi, Makoto Kubo, Chika Yumura, Yoko Takahashi, Shigeru Imoto, Shinji Ohno, Naoki Hayashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become a standard procedure for patients with breast cancer (BC) without clinically evident axillary metastasis. However, its role in cT3-4cN0 BC remains underexplored, leading to uncertainty regarding its safety. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter observational study included patients with cT3-4cN0M0 BC who underwent radical surgery between 2006 and 2016. Patients were divided into an SLNB group, which included those who underwent SLNB exclusively and ALND after SLNB, and an ALND group, which included those who underwent ALND exclusively. Inverse probability treatment weighting was applied to balance the patient characteristics, with recurrence-free survival (RFS) as the primary endpoint. Results: The study included 930 patients: 716 in the SLNB group and 214 in the ALND group. The ALND group had a higher proportion of patients diagnosed earlier, more T4 tumors, and more frequent use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. During a median follow-up period of 89 months, 176 RFS events and 51 loco-regional recurrence events occurred. After adjusting for confounding factors, no significant difference was found in 10-year RFS between the groups (74.2% vs. 79.2%). Adjusted hazard ratios for RFS did not differ between the groups, even when stratified by tumor stage (cT3, cT4) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. No significant differences were observed between the SLNB and ALND groups in loco-regional recurrence rate (LRR), with 10-year LRR rates of 93.1% and 90.8%, respectively. Conclusions: SLNB was a safe axillary staging method for patients with cT3-4cN0M0 BC and does not impact RFS or LRR negatively when compared with ALND.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1298-1307
Number of pages10
JournalBreast Cancer
Volume32
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2025
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Axillary lymph node dissection
  • Breast cancer
  • Loco-regional recurrence rate
  • Recurrence-free survival
  • Sentinel lymph node biopsy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A retrospective multi-center cohort study investigating safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy for axillary staging in clinical T3-4c breast cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this