TY - JOUR
T1 - Acetic Acid-Indigo Carmine Chromocolonoscopy for Proximal Serrated Lesions
T2 - A Randomized, Three-Arm Colonoscopy Study
AU - cAIM Study Group
AU - Kinugasa, Hideaki
AU - Hiraoka, Sakiko
AU - Kobayashi, Sayo
AU - Matsubara, Minoru
AU - Nagahara, Teruya
AU - Higashi, Reiji
AU - Takei, Kensuke
AU - Ohmori, Masayasu
AU - Nakamura, Takashi
AU - Tsuzuki, Takao
AU - Tanaka, Shouichi
AU - Hirai, Ryosuke
AU - Toyosawa, Junki
AU - Aoyama, Yuki
AU - Yamasaki, Yasushi
AU - Inokuchi, Toshihiro
AU - Takahara, Masahiro
AU - Tanaka, Takehiro
AU - Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu
AU - ootsuka, motoyuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objectives: Aggressive colorectal cancer (CRC) frequently originates from serrated lesions (SLs), particularly in the proximal colon, which are challenging to detect using standard screening colonoscopy. Although duplicate examinations or chromocolonoscopies are recommended for detecting proximal SLs, evidence from randomized trials is limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of tandem colonoscopy with an acetic acid-indigo carmine mixture (AIM) for detecting SLs in the proximal colon compared to white-light imaging (WLI) and indigo carmine (IC). Methods: This three-arm, multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving nine institutions enrolled patients undergoing colonoscopy and assigned them randomly to the WLI, IC, or AIM group. The primary outcomes were the SL-detection rate (SDR) of proximal lesions during the second examination (SDR2nd) and SL additional rate (SAR). Secondary outcomes included the detection and additional rates of other polyps, factors contributing to SAR, and complications. Results: Between 2021 and 2024, 1,319 participants with 1,267 polyps were included in the analysis. With AIM, the SDR2nd and SAR were significantly higher compared to WLI or IC (WLI vs. AIM: 2.7% vs. 14.0%, p<.001; IC vs. AIM: 7.9% vs. 14.0%, p=.002, and WLI vs. AIM: 22.4% vs. 69.3%, p<.001; IC vs. AIM: 45.8% vs. 69.3%, p=.001). AIM conferred a higher adenoma-detection rate (ADR)2nd than with WLI (10.5% vs. 24.7%; p<.001) and was an independent factor for SAR (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 7.79 [3.76–17.08]). No major adverse events were observed. Conclusions: AIM significantly improved proximal colon SDRs and outperformed WLI and IC. The relationship between SDR and CRC incidence warrants further investigation.
AB - Objectives: Aggressive colorectal cancer (CRC) frequently originates from serrated lesions (SLs), particularly in the proximal colon, which are challenging to detect using standard screening colonoscopy. Although duplicate examinations or chromocolonoscopies are recommended for detecting proximal SLs, evidence from randomized trials is limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of tandem colonoscopy with an acetic acid-indigo carmine mixture (AIM) for detecting SLs in the proximal colon compared to white-light imaging (WLI) and indigo carmine (IC). Methods: This three-arm, multicenter, randomized controlled trial involving nine institutions enrolled patients undergoing colonoscopy and assigned them randomly to the WLI, IC, or AIM group. The primary outcomes were the SL-detection rate (SDR) of proximal lesions during the second examination (SDR2nd) and SL additional rate (SAR). Secondary outcomes included the detection and additional rates of other polyps, factors contributing to SAR, and complications. Results: Between 2021 and 2024, 1,319 participants with 1,267 polyps were included in the analysis. With AIM, the SDR2nd and SAR were significantly higher compared to WLI or IC (WLI vs. AIM: 2.7% vs. 14.0%, p<.001; IC vs. AIM: 7.9% vs. 14.0%, p=.002, and WLI vs. AIM: 22.4% vs. 69.3%, p<.001; IC vs. AIM: 45.8% vs. 69.3%, p=.001). AIM conferred a higher adenoma-detection rate (ADR)2nd than with WLI (10.5% vs. 24.7%; p<.001) and was an independent factor for SAR (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]: 7.79 [3.76–17.08]). No major adverse events were observed. Conclusions: AIM significantly improved proximal colon SDRs and outperformed WLI and IC. The relationship between SDR and CRC incidence warrants further investigation.
KW - adenoma detection rate
KW - poly detection rate
KW - right-sided colon
KW - sessile serrated lesions
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=105000036955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105000036955&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003411
DO - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003411
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105000036955
SN - 0002-9270
JO - American Journal of Gastroenterology
JF - American Journal of Gastroenterology
M1 - 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003411
ER -