TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of partially penetrating slug tests in a stratified formation by alternating piezometer and tube methods
AU - Sakata, Yoshitaka
AU - Imai, Toshikazu
AU - Ikeda, Ryuji
AU - Nishigaki, Makoto
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors thank our colleagues Prof. Kazuhisa K. Chikita and Prof. Shoshiro Minobe, who provided helpful comments which led to substantial improvements. We also sincerely thank the three anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments on this paper. Technical support for this analysis was received with gratitude from our graduate students, Takuto Miyamoto, Yasuhiro Ochiai, Hiroyuki Uehara, and Sho Makino, and our colleagues Kizaki Kenji, Hideki Otake, and Asaki Yoshida. ACE Shisui Co., Ltd., Japan, collected measurements in the case study. This work was financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25920014 .
PY - 2015/9/1
Y1 - 2015/9/1
N2 - In partially penetrating slug tests, hydraulic conductivity (K) estimates might not necessarily be valid because of vertical flows in heterogeneous formations. We assess the error in hypothetical stratified formations by numerical sensitivity analysis, and propose an effective method for compensation by incorporating two types of casing configuration (piezometer and tube). The hypothetical stratified formation consists of completely horizontal layers, each 1m thick; the permeability is different between, but not within, layers. In this study, conductivity estimates in the piezometer and tube methods are calculated by assigning various patterns of conductivity to the test, upper, and lower layers: KT, KU, and KL. The effect of vertical flow becomes significant when KT is small relative to KU or KL, and KL is more important than KU because the base of the borehole is open to the lower formation. The conductivity ratios (estimate over actual value) are treated as approximately linearly dependent on logarithms of KT/KU and KT/KL, so that conductivity estimates can be straightforwardly derived from one piezometer measurement and two tube measurements at the top and bottom of the screen. The linear relations are evaluated and constant parameters are determined under specific conditions. This study also recommends alternating piezometer and tube methods in the drilling procedure because the actual variation of K with depth is larger than that found using isolated measurements, as shown in a field study of alluvial fan gravel deposits in Sapporo, Japan.
AB - In partially penetrating slug tests, hydraulic conductivity (K) estimates might not necessarily be valid because of vertical flows in heterogeneous formations. We assess the error in hypothetical stratified formations by numerical sensitivity analysis, and propose an effective method for compensation by incorporating two types of casing configuration (piezometer and tube). The hypothetical stratified formation consists of completely horizontal layers, each 1m thick; the permeability is different between, but not within, layers. In this study, conductivity estimates in the piezometer and tube methods are calculated by assigning various patterns of conductivity to the test, upper, and lower layers: KT, KU, and KL. The effect of vertical flow becomes significant when KT is small relative to KU or KL, and KL is more important than KU because the base of the borehole is open to the lower formation. The conductivity ratios (estimate over actual value) are treated as approximately linearly dependent on logarithms of KT/KU and KT/KL, so that conductivity estimates can be straightforwardly derived from one piezometer measurement and two tube measurements at the top and bottom of the screen. The linear relations are evaluated and constant parameters are determined under specific conditions. This study also recommends alternating piezometer and tube methods in the drilling procedure because the actual variation of K with depth is larger than that found using isolated measurements, as shown in a field study of alluvial fan gravel deposits in Sapporo, Japan.
KW - Heterogeneity
KW - Hydraulic conductivity
KW - Numerical simulation
KW - Partially penetrating well
KW - Sensitivity analysis
KW - Slug tests
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934284722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934284722&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.019
DO - 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.06.019
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84934284722
SN - 0022-1694
VL - 528
SP - 385
EP - 396
JO - Journal of Hydrology
JF - Journal of Hydrology
ER -