TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of hounsfield unit in the differential diagnosis of odontogenic cysts
AU - Uehara, Kyonori
AU - Hisatomi, Miki
AU - Munhoz, Luciana
AU - Kawazu, Toshiyuki
AU - Yanagi, Yoshinobu
AU - Okada, Shunsuke
AU - Takeshita, Yohei
AU - Saito, Emiko Arita
AU - Asaumi, Junichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Published by the British Institute of Radiology
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of Hounsfield unit (HU) assessment with multislice-CT in the differentiation of radicular cysts (RCs), dentigerous cysts (DCs) and odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs). Methods: In total, 307 odontogenic cysts (RCs, DCs and OKCs) were included in this study. Cysts with lesion diameter <10 mm, cysts with artefacts affecting measurement of HU values, cysts involving infection and recurrent cysts were regarded as exclusion criteria. Images were acquired in three different types of CT scanners: Aquilion ONE, Discovery CT750 HD and SOMATOM Definition Flash. Differences in HU values among scanners and among types of odontogenic cysts were assessed using one-way analysis of variance; multiple comparisons were performed post hoc, using the Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference test. Results: In total, 164 cysts were analysed in this study (64 RCs, 57 DCs and 43 OKCs). Regardless of the type of lesion, the Aquilion ONE scanner demonstrated a significant difference in HU value, compared with the Discovery CT750 HD scanner. Regardless of CT scanner model, HU values significantly differed between DCs and OKCs (p < 0.0001), as well as between OKCs and RCs (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: HU values were found to vary among CT scanners and should always be associated with other lesion imaging features while interpreting and elaboration diagnostic hypothesis. Notably, the results suggested that OKCs might be able to be differentiated from DCs and RCs by using HU values.
AB - Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of Hounsfield unit (HU) assessment with multislice-CT in the differentiation of radicular cysts (RCs), dentigerous cysts (DCs) and odontogenic keratocysts (OKCs). Methods: In total, 307 odontogenic cysts (RCs, DCs and OKCs) were included in this study. Cysts with lesion diameter <10 mm, cysts with artefacts affecting measurement of HU values, cysts involving infection and recurrent cysts were regarded as exclusion criteria. Images were acquired in three different types of CT scanners: Aquilion ONE, Discovery CT750 HD and SOMATOM Definition Flash. Differences in HU values among scanners and among types of odontogenic cysts were assessed using one-way analysis of variance; multiple comparisons were performed post hoc, using the Tukey-Kramer honestly significant difference test. Results: In total, 164 cysts were analysed in this study (64 RCs, 57 DCs and 43 OKCs). Regardless of the type of lesion, the Aquilion ONE scanner demonstrated a significant difference in HU value, compared with the Discovery CT750 HD scanner. Regardless of CT scanner model, HU values significantly differed between DCs and OKCs (p < 0.0001), as well as between OKCs and RCs (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: HU values were found to vary among CT scanners and should always be associated with other lesion imaging features while interpreting and elaboration diagnostic hypothesis. Notably, the results suggested that OKCs might be able to be differentiated from DCs and RCs by using HU values.
KW - Dentigerous cyst
KW - Multidetector computed tomography
KW - Odontogenic cyst
KW - Odontogenic keratocyst
KW - Radicular cyst
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100360602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100360602&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1259/dmfr.20200188
DO - 10.1259/dmfr.20200188
M3 - Article
C2 - 32783633
AN - SCOPUS:85100360602
SN - 0250-832X
VL - 50
JO - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
JF - Dentomaxillofacial Radiology
IS - 2
M1 - 20200188
ER -