TY - JOUR
T1 - Catalytic degradation of polyethylene and polypropylene into liquid hydrocarbons with mesoporous silica
AU - Uddin, M. Azhar
AU - Sakata, Yusaku
AU - Muto, Akinori
AU - Shiraga, Yoshitaka
AU - Koizumi, Kazuo
AU - Kanada, Yasufumi
AU - Murata, Katsuhide
N1 - Funding Information:
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of this work by the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan, through the Grants-In-Aid for Scientific Research No. 08232258 (1996) and No. 09218241 (1997), and by the Original Industrial Technology R&D Promotion Program from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan through Grant 8G-010.
PY - 1998/5
Y1 - 1998/5
N2 - The catalytic degradation of polyolefinic polymers such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) was carried out at atmospheric pressure by batch operation at 430°C and 380°C using non-acidic mesoporous silica catalyst (FSM). A comparison with non-catalytic thermal degradation and catalytic degradation using solid acid catalysts (silica-alumina, zeolite ZSM-5), silicalite, and silica-gel was made. Compared with thermal degradation, non-acidic FSM catalyst accelerated the initial rate of degradation, increased the liquid product yield and promoted degradation into lower molecular weight products. Silicalite and silica-gel had very negligible effects on polymer degradation. When the batch reaction was repeated four times using the same FSM catalyst, the extent of the decline in the degradation rate was lower for PE than PP. Compared with the solid acid catalyst, which turned completely black in the cases of both PE and PP, the deposition of coke on the used FSM catalyst was extremely slight. It seems likely that the catalytic effect of FSM for polyolefinic polymer degradation is related more to the hexagonal pore structure system of FSM.
AB - The catalytic degradation of polyolefinic polymers such as polyethylene (PE) and polypropylene (PP) was carried out at atmospheric pressure by batch operation at 430°C and 380°C using non-acidic mesoporous silica catalyst (FSM). A comparison with non-catalytic thermal degradation and catalytic degradation using solid acid catalysts (silica-alumina, zeolite ZSM-5), silicalite, and silica-gel was made. Compared with thermal degradation, non-acidic FSM catalyst accelerated the initial rate of degradation, increased the liquid product yield and promoted degradation into lower molecular weight products. Silicalite and silica-gel had very negligible effects on polymer degradation. When the batch reaction was repeated four times using the same FSM catalyst, the extent of the decline in the degradation rate was lower for PE than PP. Compared with the solid acid catalyst, which turned completely black in the cases of both PE and PP, the deposition of coke on the used FSM catalyst was extremely slight. It seems likely that the catalytic effect of FSM for polyolefinic polymer degradation is related more to the hexagonal pore structure system of FSM.
KW - Catalytic degradation
KW - FSM
KW - Fuel oil
KW - Mesoporous silica
KW - PE
KW - PP
KW - Polymer degradation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032065732&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032065732&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/s1387-1811(98)00036-5
DO - 10.1016/s1387-1811(98)00036-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0032065732
SN - 1387-1811
VL - 21
SP - 557
EP - 564
JO - Microporous Materials
JF - Microporous Materials
IS - 4-6
ER -