@article{ac8d5eae9fee4253b6b387b0bb65ec78,
title = "Chronological improvement in precision oncology implementation in Japan",
abstract = "In Japan, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) tests for refractory cancer patients have been approved since June 2019, under the requirement that all cases undergoing CGP tests are annotated by the molecular tumor board (MTB) at each government-designated hospital. To investigate improvement in precision oncology, we evaluated and compared the proportion of cases receiving matched treatments according to CGP results and those recommended to receive genetic counseling at all core hospitals between the first period (11 hospitals, June 2019 to January 2020) and second period (12 hospitals, February 2020 to January 2021). A total of 754 and 2294 cases underwent CGP tests at core hospitals in the first and second periods, respectively; 28 (3.7%) and 176 (7.7%) patients received matched treatments (p < 0.001). Additionally, 25 (3.3%) and 237 (10.3%) cases were recommended to receive genetic counseling in the first and second periods, respectively (p < 0.001). The proportion was associated with the type of CGP test: tumor-only (N = 2391) vs. tumor-normal paired (N = 657) analysis (10.0% vs. 3.5%). These results suggest that recommendations regarding available clinical trials in networked MTBs might contribute to increasing the numbers of matched treatments, and that tumor-normal paired rather than tumor-only tests can increase the efficiency of patient referrals for genetic counseling.",
keywords = "comprehension genomic profiling test, genetic counseling, genomically matched therapy, molecular tumor board, precision oncology",
author = "Kuniko Sunami and Yoichi Naito and Keigo Komine and Toraji Amano and Daisuke Ennishi and Mitsuho Imai and Hidenori Kage and Masashi Kanai and Hirotsugu Kenmotsu and Takafumi Koyama and Takahiro Maeda and Sachi Morita and Daisuke Sakai and Shinji Kohsaka and Katsuya Tsuchihara and Yusuke Saigusa and Takayuki Yoshino",
note = "Funding Information: Kuniko Sunami received research funds from Sysmex. Yoichi Naito received lecture fees from Chugai, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and Novartis, and research funds from Daiichi‐Sankyo, Taiho, Pfizer, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Daisuke Ennishi received lecture fees from Kyowa Kirin and Eisai, and research funds from Chugai and Nihon Shinyaku. Hidenori Kage received research funds from Konica Minolta. Masashi Kanai receives annual profit from Therabiopharma Inc. and received manuscript fees from Chugai. Hirotsugu Kenmotsu received research funds from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Loxo Oncology, Daiichi‐Sankyo, and Chugai. Takafumi Koyama received research lecture fees from Sysmex and research funds from PACT Pharma. Takayuki Yoshino received lecture fees from Taiho, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Takeda, Merck Biopharma, Bayer Yakuhin, and Ono, and research funds from MSD, Ono, Sanofi, Daiichi‐Sankyo, Parexel International, Amgen, Taiho, and Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma. None of the other authors have any conflicts of interest. Katsuya Tsuchihara is the associate editor of the journal. Funding Information: This work was supported by a Health Labour Sciences Special Research Grant (19EA1007) from the MHLW, Japan. Funding Information: The authors thank all MTB members at the 12 Cores, and Hideki Ueno and Yuichiro Ohe for supporting this study. This study was supported by grants from the MHLW Japan. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1111/cas.15517",
language = "English",
journal = "Cancer Science",
issn = "1347-9032",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
}