TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparison of Oxygen Saturation Between Nasal High-Flow Oxygen and Conventional Nasal Cannula in Obese Patients Undergoing Dental Procedures With Deep Sedation
T2 - A Randomized Crossover Trial
AU - Higuchi, Hitoshi
AU - Takaya-Ishida, Kumiko
AU - Miyake, Saki
AU - Fujimoto, Maki
AU - Nishioka, Yukiko
AU - Maeda, Shigeru
AU - Miyawaki, Takuya
N1 - Funding Information:
Disclosures: The present study was financially supported by Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences and grant from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI, Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B), grant number 17K17372 ).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Purpose: In anesthetic management, it is widely accepted that obese patients are more likely to suffer airway obstructions and reductions in arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2). Therefore, it is important to take special measures to prevent oxygen desaturation during the deep sedation of obese patients. This clinical study examined whether the use of nasal high-flow systems (NHFS) keep higher SpO2 and reduced hypoxemia than conventional nasal cannula during the deep sedation of obese patients with intellectual disabilities for dental treatment. Materials and Methods: Eighteen obese patients (body mass index: >25) with intellectual disabilities who underwent dental sedation were enrolled. In each case, sedation was induced using propofol and maintained at a bispectral index of 50 to 70. The subjects were randomly assigned to the control oxygen administration (5 L/min via a nasal cannula) or NHFS (40% O2, 40 L/min, 37 °C) arm in alternate shifts as a crossover trial. The primary endpoint was the minimum SpO2 value, and the incidence of hypoxemia during dental treatment was also evaluated. Results: The mean minimum SpO2 value was significantly higher in the NHFS arm than in the control arm (95.8 ± 2.1 % vs 93.6 ± 4.1 %, P = 0.0052, 95% confidence interval: 0.608-3.947). Hypoxemic episodes (SpO2: ≤94%) occurred 3 cases (16.7%) in the NHFS arm and 11 cases (61.1%) in the control arm (P = 0.0076, odds ratio: 0.127, 95% confidence interval 0.0324 - 0.630). Conclusion: NHFS resulted in higher minimum SpO2 and reduced hypoxemia than nasal cannula in obese patients during deep sedation for dental treatment.
AB - Purpose: In anesthetic management, it is widely accepted that obese patients are more likely to suffer airway obstructions and reductions in arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2). Therefore, it is important to take special measures to prevent oxygen desaturation during the deep sedation of obese patients. This clinical study examined whether the use of nasal high-flow systems (NHFS) keep higher SpO2 and reduced hypoxemia than conventional nasal cannula during the deep sedation of obese patients with intellectual disabilities for dental treatment. Materials and Methods: Eighteen obese patients (body mass index: >25) with intellectual disabilities who underwent dental sedation were enrolled. In each case, sedation was induced using propofol and maintained at a bispectral index of 50 to 70. The subjects were randomly assigned to the control oxygen administration (5 L/min via a nasal cannula) or NHFS (40% O2, 40 L/min, 37 °C) arm in alternate shifts as a crossover trial. The primary endpoint was the minimum SpO2 value, and the incidence of hypoxemia during dental treatment was also evaluated. Results: The mean minimum SpO2 value was significantly higher in the NHFS arm than in the control arm (95.8 ± 2.1 % vs 93.6 ± 4.1 %, P = 0.0052, 95% confidence interval: 0.608-3.947). Hypoxemic episodes (SpO2: ≤94%) occurred 3 cases (16.7%) in the NHFS arm and 11 cases (61.1%) in the control arm (P = 0.0076, odds ratio: 0.127, 95% confidence interval 0.0324 - 0.630). Conclusion: NHFS resulted in higher minimum SpO2 and reduced hypoxemia than nasal cannula in obese patients during deep sedation for dental treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107870714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107870714&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.joms.2021.04.004
DO - 10.1016/j.joms.2021.04.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 34022138
AN - SCOPUS:85107870714
SN - 0278-2391
VL - 79
SP - 1842
EP - 1850
JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 9
ER -