Comparison of screw versus locking plate fixation via sinus tarsi approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures

Kohei Sato, Masanori Yorimitsu, Takenori Uehara, Shiro Fukuoka, Toshiaki Hata, Kenta Saiga, Tomoyuki Noda, Toshifumi Ozaki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The optimal treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures (DIACF) is controversial. This study compared the fixation stability of screws and locking plates in DIACF treated via the sinus tarsi approach (STA). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 118 DIACF cases treated via STA and extracted data that could affect treatment outcomes. Loss of Böhler's angle after surgery was measured to compare fixation stability. Results: The loss of Böhler's angles was significantly smaller in the locking plate group than in the screw group (2.6 ± 2.7º vs. 5.6 ± 5.3º, P < 0.01). There was no difference in the clinical outcomes between the groups. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, screw fixation was significantly associated with loss of Böhler's angle by> 10º (odds ratio, 8.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.16–64.4; P < 0.05). Conclusions: Locking plate fixation is more reliable than screw fixation for preventing correction loss in DIACF treated via STA.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFoot and Ankle Surgery
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2022

Keywords

  • Böhler's angle
  • Calcaneal fracture
  • Locking plate fixation
  • Screw fixation
  • Sinus tarsi approach

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of screw versus locking plate fixation via sinus tarsi approach for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this