TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction to
T2 - Outcomes of endoscopic treatment for malignant biliary obstruction in patients with surgically altered anatomy: analysis of risk factors for clinical failure (Surgical Endoscopy, (2021), 35, 1, (232-238), 10.1007/s00464-020-07385-y)
AU - Tomoda, Takeshi
AU - Kato, Hironari
AU - Miyamoto, Kazuya
AU - Matsumi, Akihiro
AU - Ueta, Eijiro
AU - Fujii, Yuuki
AU - Saragai, Yousuke
AU - Yamazaki, Tatsuhiro
AU - Uchida, Daisuke
AU - Matsumoto, Kazuyuki
AU - Horiguchi, Shigeru
AU - Tsutsumi, Koichiro
AU - Okada, Hiroyuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2021/1
Y1 - 2021/1
N2 - There are several places where the P-value and Odds ratio in Table 3 are incorrect: these are shown in the corrected Table 3. The following two sentences related to Table 3 should be corrected: 1. In the Results section of the Abstract, the sentence “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 7.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–43.5, p = 0.02) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” should read: “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–32.8, p = 0.008) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” 2. In the last line of Clinical outcome section, the sentence “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 7.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–43.5) (p = 0.02) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” should read: “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–32.8) (p = 0.008) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” The authors regret these errors.
AB - There are several places where the P-value and Odds ratio in Table 3 are incorrect: these are shown in the corrected Table 3. The following two sentences related to Table 3 should be corrected: 1. In the Results section of the Abstract, the sentence “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 7.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–43.5, p = 0.02) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” should read: “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–32.8, p = 0.008) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” 2. In the last line of Clinical outcome section, the sentence “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 7.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5–43.5) (p = 0.02) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” should read: “In multivariate analysis, the presence of peritoneal dissemination (odds ratio, 6.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–32.8) (p = 0.008) was as an independent risk factor for clinical failure.” The authors regret these errors.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079160180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079160180&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00464-020-07399-6
DO - 10.1007/s00464-020-07399-6
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 32030547
AN - SCOPUS:85079160180
SN - 0930-2794
VL - 35
SP - 239
EP - 240
JO - Surgical Endoscopy
JF - Surgical Endoscopy
IS - 1
ER -