TY - JOUR
T1 - Design and methods of a strategic outcome study for chronic kidney disease
T2 - Frontier of renal Outcome Modifications in Japan
AU - Yamagata, Kunihiro
AU - Makino, Hirofumi
AU - Akizawa, Tadao
AU - Iseki, Kunitoshi
AU - Itoh, Sadayoshi
AU - Kimura, Kenjiro
AU - Koya, Daisuke
AU - Narita, Ichiei
AU - Mitarai, Tetsuya
AU - Miyazaki, Masanobu
AU - Tsubakihara, Yoshiharu
AU - Watanabe, Tsuyoshi
AU - Wada, Takashi
AU - Sakai, Osamu
N1 - Funding Information:
We express our thanks to the doctors and dietitians who participated in this study. We also express our thanks for the continuous support from members of the Japanese Society of Nephrology, the Japan Dietetic Association, and the Japanese Medical Association. We further thank Dr. Toshiyuki Imasawa, Dr. Chie Saitoh, Dr. Hirayasu Kai, Dr. Hideto Takahashi, Dr. Masafumi Okada, and Ms. Mariko Doi for valuable discussion and preparation of this manuscript. This study was supported by a grant for a strategic outcome study project from the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare of Japan.
PY - 2010/4
Y1 - 2010/4
N2 - Background: The continuous increase in the number of people requiring dialysis is a major clinical and socioeconomical issue in Japan and other countries. This study was designed to encourage chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients to consult a physician, enhance cooperation between nephrologists and general practices, and prevent the progression of kidney disease. Methods: Subjects comprise CKD patients aged between 40 and 74 years consulting a general physician, and patients in CKD stage 3 with proteinuria and diabetes or hypertension. This trial is a stratified open cluster-randomized study with two intervention groups: group A (weak intervention) and group B (strong intervention). We have recruited 49 local medical associations (clusters) in 15 different prefectures, which were classified into four regions (strata) based on the level of increase rate of dialysis patients. The patients in group A clusters were instructed initially to undergo treatment in accordance with the current CKD treatment guide, whereas patients in group B clusters were not only instructed in the same fashion but also received support from an information technology (IT)-based system designed to help achieve the goals of CKD treatment, consultation support centers, and consultations by dietitians visiting the local general practice offices. We assessed the rates of continued consultation, collaboration between general practitioners and nephrologists, and progression of CKD (as expressed by CKD stage). Conclusion: Through this study, filling the evidence-practice gap by facilitating effective communication and supporting general physicians and nephrologists, we will establish a CKD care system and decrease the number of advanced-stage CKD patients.
AB - Background: The continuous increase in the number of people requiring dialysis is a major clinical and socioeconomical issue in Japan and other countries. This study was designed to encourage chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients to consult a physician, enhance cooperation between nephrologists and general practices, and prevent the progression of kidney disease. Methods: Subjects comprise CKD patients aged between 40 and 74 years consulting a general physician, and patients in CKD stage 3 with proteinuria and diabetes or hypertension. This trial is a stratified open cluster-randomized study with two intervention groups: group A (weak intervention) and group B (strong intervention). We have recruited 49 local medical associations (clusters) in 15 different prefectures, which were classified into four regions (strata) based on the level of increase rate of dialysis patients. The patients in group A clusters were instructed initially to undergo treatment in accordance with the current CKD treatment guide, whereas patients in group B clusters were not only instructed in the same fashion but also received support from an information technology (IT)-based system designed to help achieve the goals of CKD treatment, consultation support centers, and consultations by dietitians visiting the local general practice offices. We assessed the rates of continued consultation, collaboration between general practitioners and nephrologists, and progression of CKD (as expressed by CKD stage). Conclusion: Through this study, filling the evidence-practice gap by facilitating effective communication and supporting general physicians and nephrologists, we will establish a CKD care system and decrease the number of advanced-stage CKD patients.
KW - Chronic kidney disease
KW - Cluster-randomized study
KW - Cooperation between nephrologists and general physicians
KW - Educational intervention
KW - Evidence-practice gap
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952876367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952876367&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10157-009-0249-4
DO - 10.1007/s10157-009-0249-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 20020312
AN - SCOPUS:77952876367
SN - 1342-1751
VL - 14
SP - 144
EP - 151
JO - Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
JF - Clinical and Experimental Nephrology
IS - 2
ER -