TY - JOUR
T1 - Development and validation of a prediction model for failed shockwave lithotripsy of upper urinary tract calculi using computed tomography information
T2 - the S3HoCKwave score
AU - the Okayama-Ehime S.W.L. Study Group
AU - Yoshioka, Takashi
AU - Ikenoue, Tatsuyoshi
AU - Hashimoto, Hideaki
AU - Otsuki, Hideo
AU - Oeda, Tadashi
AU - Ishito, Noritaka
AU - Watanabe, Ryuta
AU - Saika, Takashi
AU - Araki, Motoo
AU - Fukuhara, Shunichi
AU - Yamamoto, Yosuke
AU - Yamashita, Masahiro
AU - Imoto, Masaya
AU - Aoki, Hiroshi
AU - Yamasaki, Tomoya
AU - Fujio, Kei
AU - Kawada, Tatsushi
AU - Takamoto, Hitoshi
AU - Iio, Hiroyuki
AU - Iseda, Tokuhiro
AU - Sadahira, Takuya
AU - Ishii, Kazushi
AU - Wada, Koichiro
AU - Uehara, Shinya
AU - Miyaji, Yoshiyuki
AU - Hinotsu, shiro
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank the members of the Okayama-Ehime SWL Study Group: Masahiro Yamashita, Masaya Imoto, Hiroshi Aoki, Tomoya Yamasaki, Kei Fujio, Tatsushi Kawada, Hitoshi Takamoto, Hiroyuki Iio, Tokuhiro Iseda, Takuya Sadahira, Kazushi Ishii, Koichiro Wada, Shinya Uehara, Yoshiyuki Miyaji, and Shiro Hinotsu. We also thank all the radiological technicians at Okayama Central Hospital (Kazuhiro Ota, Natsuha Ikeda, Yoshinori Kamihoriuchi, Hirotaka Tanimoto, Masato Hiraki, Yuta Fujiwara, Ayako Mori, Fumie Higuchi, and Makoto Suzuki) for their support collecting data.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020, The Author(s).
PY - 2020/12
Y1 - 2020/12
N2 - Purpose: To develop and validate a new clinical prediction model that accurately predicts the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) using information obtained from non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT). Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled patients diagnosed with upper urinary tract calculi by NCCT at five hospitals in Japan from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2016. Among the candidate predictors, we selected the six most significant predictors a priori. The main outcome was SWL failure after three sessions. Model calibration was evaluated by the calibration slope and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Discrimination was evaluated by the receiver-operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed; based on the estimated β coefficients, predictive scores were generated. Results: Of 2695 patients, 2271 were included. Patients were divided into the development cohort (1666 patients) and validation cohort (605 patients) according to geographical factors. We developed a clinical prediction model with scores ranging from 0 to 49 points. We named the prediction model the S3HoCKwave score based on the initials of the predictors (sex, skin-to-stone distance, size, Hounsfield units, colic, and kidney or ureter). As a result of internal validation, the optimism-corrected AUC was 0.72. In the validation cohort, the Hosmer–Lemeshow test did not show statistical significance (P = 0.33), and the AUC was 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.65–0.76). Conclusions: The S3HoCKwave score is easy to understand, has a relatively high predictive value, and allows clinicians to make appropriate treatment selections.
AB - Purpose: To develop and validate a new clinical prediction model that accurately predicts the failure of shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) using information obtained from non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT). Methods: This multicentre retrospective cohort study consecutively enrolled patients diagnosed with upper urinary tract calculi by NCCT at five hospitals in Japan from January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2016. Among the candidate predictors, we selected the six most significant predictors a priori. The main outcome was SWL failure after three sessions. Model calibration was evaluated by the calibration slope and the Hosmer–Lemeshow test. Discrimination was evaluated by the receiver-operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC). A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed; based on the estimated β coefficients, predictive scores were generated. Results: Of 2695 patients, 2271 were included. Patients were divided into the development cohort (1666 patients) and validation cohort (605 patients) according to geographical factors. We developed a clinical prediction model with scores ranging from 0 to 49 points. We named the prediction model the S3HoCKwave score based on the initials of the predictors (sex, skin-to-stone distance, size, Hounsfield units, colic, and kidney or ureter). As a result of internal validation, the optimism-corrected AUC was 0.72. In the validation cohort, the Hosmer–Lemeshow test did not show statistical significance (P = 0.33), and the AUC was 0.71 (95% confidence interval 0.65–0.76). Conclusions: The S3HoCKwave score is easy to understand, has a relatively high predictive value, and allows clinicians to make appropriate treatment selections.
KW - Decision making
KW - Decision support techniques
KW - Extracorporeal shockwave therapy
KW - Urolithiasis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079742484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079742484&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00345-020-03125-y
DO - 10.1007/s00345-020-03125-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 32088747
AN - SCOPUS:85079742484
SN - 0724-4983
VL - 38
SP - 3267
EP - 3273
JO - World Journal of Urology
JF - World Journal of Urology
IS - 12
ER -