TY - GEN
T1 - Effect of cue-target interval on temporally endogenous attention of no-go target
T2 - 2012 9th IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, ICMA 2012
AU - Gao, Yulin
AU - Tang, Xiaoyu
AU - Li, Chunlin
AU - Yang, Jingjing
AU - Yang, Weiping
AU - Takahashi, Satoshi
AU - Wu, Jinglong
PY - 2012/10/23
Y1 - 2012/10/23
N2 - P300 event-related brain potential (ERP) measures are affected by target stimulus probability, the number of no-go targets preceding the target in the stimulus sequence structure, and inter stimulus interval (ISI). Each of these factors contributes to the target-to-target interval (TTI), which also has been found to affect P300. Here we combined the cue-target paradigm with the task to investigate when the central cue could completely predicts the cue-target interval (CTI) (600ms or 1800ms), which induced totally temporally endogenous attention, whether the cue-target interval (the time between cue-offset and target-onset) could affect the amplitude or latency of P300 component or not. The results showed that the latency of P300 would not change in short (600ms) or long (1800ms) cue-target intervals conditions, which indicating the temporally endogenous attention had no effect on the time processing of the target, even the temporal cue could predict when the target appeared. However, the mean amplitude of P300 (from 300ms to 600ms, after target onset) increased with the increasing cue-target interval, which might support that the temporal factor that was either target-target interval or cue-target interval, might determine the amplitude of P300.
AB - P300 event-related brain potential (ERP) measures are affected by target stimulus probability, the number of no-go targets preceding the target in the stimulus sequence structure, and inter stimulus interval (ISI). Each of these factors contributes to the target-to-target interval (TTI), which also has been found to affect P300. Here we combined the cue-target paradigm with the task to investigate when the central cue could completely predicts the cue-target interval (CTI) (600ms or 1800ms), which induced totally temporally endogenous attention, whether the cue-target interval (the time between cue-offset and target-onset) could affect the amplitude or latency of P300 component or not. The results showed that the latency of P300 would not change in short (600ms) or long (1800ms) cue-target intervals conditions, which indicating the temporally endogenous attention had no effect on the time processing of the target, even the temporal cue could predict when the target appeared. However, the mean amplitude of P300 (from 300ms to 600ms, after target onset) increased with the increasing cue-target interval, which might support that the temporal factor that was either target-target interval or cue-target interval, might determine the amplitude of P300.
KW - ERP
KW - ISI
KW - No-Go target
KW - P300
KW - Temporally endogenous attention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867616229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867616229&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ICMA.2012.6284342
DO - 10.1109/ICMA.2012.6284342
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84867616229
SN - 9781467312776
T3 - 2012 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, ICMA 2012
SP - 1405
EP - 1410
BT - 2012 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, ICMA 2012
Y2 - 5 August 2012 through 8 August 2012
ER -