TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy and safety of intravesical instillation of KRP-116D (50% dimethyl sulfoxide solution) for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome in Japanese patients
T2 - A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical study
AU - Yoshimura, Naoki
AU - Homma, Yukio
AU - Tomoe, Hikaru
AU - Otsuka, Atsushi
AU - Kitta, Takeya
AU - Masumori, Naoya
AU - Akiyama, Yoshiyuki
AU - Niimi, Aya
AU - Mitsui, Takahiko
AU - Nanri, Masaharu
AU - Namima, Takashige
AU - Takei, Mineo
AU - Yamaguchi, Akito
AU - Sekiguchi, Yuki
AU - Kajiwara, Mitsuru
AU - Kobayashi, Shinya
AU - Ameda, Kaname
AU - Ohashi, Yozo
AU - Sakamoto, Sadaaki
AU - Muraki, Osamu
AU - Shishido, Toshihide
AU - Kageyama, Shinji
AU - Kokura, Koji
AU - Okazoe, Homare
AU - Yamanishi, Tomonori
AU - Watanabe, Toyohiko
AU - Uno, Takashi
AU - Ohinata, Akira
AU - Ueda, Tomohiro
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and the National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Japan. The authors thank Dr Yoji Inoue for participation in this study as principal investigator. They thank Dr Tetsuji Asao (SunFlare Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for medical writing services, which were funded by Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Mr Shigeki Nawata, a member of the Data Science Group in Kyorin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., for conducting all statistical analyses.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. International Journal of Urology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Urological Association
PY - 2021/5
Y1 - 2021/5
N2 - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravesical KRP-116D, 50% dimethyl sulfoxide solution compared with placebo, in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients. Methods: Japanese interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients with an O’Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index score of ≥9, who exhibited the bladder-centric phenotype of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome diagnosed by cystoscopy and bladder-derived pain, were enrolled. Patients were allocated to receive either KRP-116D (n = 49) or placebo (n = 47). The study drug was intravesically administered every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. Results: For the primary endpoint, the change in the mean O’Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index score from baseline to week 12 was −5.2 in the KRP-116D group and −3.4 in the placebo group. The estimated difference between the KRP-116D and placebo groups was −1.8 (95% confidence interval −3.3, −0.3; P = 0.0188). Statistically significant improvements for KRP-116D were also observed in the secondary endpoints including O’Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index score, micturition episodes/24 h, voided volume/micturition, maximum voided volume/micturition, numerical rating scale score for bladder pain, and global response assessment score. The adverse drug reactions were mild to moderate, and manageable. Conclusions: This first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial shows that KRP-116D improves symptoms, voiding parameters, and global response assessment, compared with placebo, and has a well-tolerated safety profile in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients with the bladder-centric phenotype.
AB - Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravesical KRP-116D, 50% dimethyl sulfoxide solution compared with placebo, in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients. Methods: Japanese interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients with an O’Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index score of ≥9, who exhibited the bladder-centric phenotype of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome diagnosed by cystoscopy and bladder-derived pain, were enrolled. Patients were allocated to receive either KRP-116D (n = 49) or placebo (n = 47). The study drug was intravesically administered every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. Results: For the primary endpoint, the change in the mean O’Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index score from baseline to week 12 was −5.2 in the KRP-116D group and −3.4 in the placebo group. The estimated difference between the KRP-116D and placebo groups was −1.8 (95% confidence interval −3.3, −0.3; P = 0.0188). Statistically significant improvements for KRP-116D were also observed in the secondary endpoints including O’Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Problem Index score, micturition episodes/24 h, voided volume/micturition, maximum voided volume/micturition, numerical rating scale score for bladder pain, and global response assessment score. The adverse drug reactions were mild to moderate, and manageable. Conclusions: This first randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial shows that KRP-116D improves symptoms, voiding parameters, and global response assessment, compared with placebo, and has a well-tolerated safety profile in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome patients with the bladder-centric phenotype.
KW - bladder pain syndrome
KW - bladder-centric phenotype
KW - dimethyl sulfoxide
KW - interstitial cystitis
KW - randomized controlled trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100837404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100837404&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/iju.14505
DO - 10.1111/iju.14505
M3 - Article
C2 - 33580603
AN - SCOPUS:85100837404
SN - 0919-8172
VL - 28
SP - 545
EP - 553
JO - International Journal of Urology
JF - International Journal of Urology
IS - 5
ER -