TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficient embryo transfer in the common marmoset monkey (Callithrix jacchus) with a reduced transfer volume
T2 - A non-surgical approach with cryopreserved late-stage embryos1
AU - Ishibashi, Hidetoshi
AU - Motohashi, Hideyuki H.
AU - Kumon, Mami
AU - Yamamoto, Kazuhiro
AU - Okada, Hironori
AU - Okada, Takashi
AU - Seki, Kazuhiko
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Among primates, the common marmoset is suitable for primate embryology research. Its small body size, however, has delayed the technical development of efficient embryo transfer. Furthermore, three factors have been determined to adversely affect the performance of marmoset embryo transfer: nonsurgical approaches, the use of cryopreserved embryos, and the use of late-stage embryos. Here we performed embryo transfer under conditions that included the above three factors and using either a small (1 ll or less) or a large volume (2-3 ll) of medium. The pregnancy and birth rates were 50% (5/10) and 27% (3/11), respectively, when using the large volume, and 80% (8/10) and 75% (9/12), respectively, when using the small volume. The latter scores exceed those of previous reports using comparable conditions. Thus, it appears that these three previously considered factors could be overcome, and we propose that reducing the transfer volume to 1 ll or less is essential for successful marmoset embryo transfer.
AB - Among primates, the common marmoset is suitable for primate embryology research. Its small body size, however, has delayed the technical development of efficient embryo transfer. Furthermore, three factors have been determined to adversely affect the performance of marmoset embryo transfer: nonsurgical approaches, the use of cryopreserved embryos, and the use of late-stage embryos. Here we performed embryo transfer under conditions that included the above three factors and using either a small (1 ll or less) or a large volume (2-3 ll) of medium. The pregnancy and birth rates were 50% (5/10) and 27% (3/11), respectively, when using the large volume, and 80% (8/10) and 75% (9/12), respectively, when using the small volume. The latter scores exceed those of previous reports using comparable conditions. Thus, it appears that these three previously considered factors could be overcome, and we propose that reducing the transfer volume to 1 ll or less is essential for successful marmoset embryo transfer.
KW - Birth weight
KW - Cryopreservation
KW - Double embryo transfer
KW - Endometrium
KW - Litter size
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881006571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881006571&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1095/biolreprod.113.109165
DO - 10.1095/biolreprod.113.109165
M3 - Article
C2 - 23536374
AN - SCOPUS:84881006571
SN - 0006-3363
VL - 88
JO - Biology of reproduction
JF - Biology of reproduction
IS - 5
M1 - Article 115
ER -