TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic detection and differentiation of esophageal lesions using a deep neural network
AU - Ohmori, Masayasu
AU - Ishihara, Ryu
AU - Aoyama, Kazuharu
AU - Nakagawa, Kentaro
AU - Iwagami, Hiroyoshi
AU - Matsuura, Noriko
AU - Shichijo, Satoki
AU - Yamamoto, Katsumi
AU - Nagaike, Koji
AU - Nakahara, Masanori
AU - Inoue, Takuya
AU - Aoi, Kenji
AU - Okada, Hiroyuki
AU - Tada, Tomohiro
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank S. Hiyama (Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Osaka Hospital), T. Kannno (Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Osaka Hospital), Y. Onishi (Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Osaka Hospital) M. Sawamura (Japan Community Healthcare Organization, Osaka Hospital), K. Nagai (Suita Municipal Hospital), N. Dan (Suita Municipal Hospital), Y. Matsumoto (Ikeda Municipal Hospital), Y. Yamaguchi (Ikeda Municipal Hospital), Y. Masuda (Ikeda Municipal Hospital), S. Kawai (Osaka General Medical Center), and Y. Kakita (Kaiduka City Hospital) for acting as experienced endoscopists. We also thank M. Kono, H. Fukuda, Y. Shimamoto, T. Iwatsubo, K. Matsuno, S. Inoue, H. Nakahira, A. Maekawa, and T. Kanesaka from the Osaka International Cancer Institute for data collection and Susan Furness, PhD, from the Edanz Group (www.edanzediting.com/ac) for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
PY - 2020/2
Y1 - 2020/2
N2 - Background and Aims: Diagnosing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) depends on individual physician expertise and may be subject to interobserver variability. Therefore, we developed a computerized image-analysis system to detect and differentiate esophageal SCC. Methods: A total of 9591 nonmagnified endoscopy (non-ME) and 7844 ME images of pathologically confirmed superficial esophageal SCCs and 1692 non-ME and 3435 ME images from noncancerous lesions or normal esophagus were used as training image data. Validation was performed using 255 non-ME white-light images, 268 non-ME narrow-band images/blue-laser images, and 204 ME narrow-band images/blue-laser images from 135 patients. The same validation test data were diagnosed by 15 board-certified specialists (experienced endoscopists). Results: Regarding diagnosis by non-ME with narrow-band imaging/blue-laser imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100%, 63%, and 77%, respectively, for the artificial intelligence (AI) system and 92%, 69%, and 78%, respectively, for the experienced endoscopists. Regarding diagnosis by non-ME with white-light imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 90%, 76%, and 81%, respectively, for the AI system and 87%, 67%, and 75%, respectively, for the experienced endoscopists. Regarding diagnosis by ME, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 98%, 56%, and 77%, respectively, for the AI system and 83%, 70%, and 76%, respectively, for the experienced endoscopists. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance between the AI system and the experienced endoscopists. Conclusions: Our AI system showed high sensitivity for detecting SCC by non-ME and high accuracy for differentiating SCC from noncancerous lesions by ME.
AB - Background and Aims: Diagnosing esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) depends on individual physician expertise and may be subject to interobserver variability. Therefore, we developed a computerized image-analysis system to detect and differentiate esophageal SCC. Methods: A total of 9591 nonmagnified endoscopy (non-ME) and 7844 ME images of pathologically confirmed superficial esophageal SCCs and 1692 non-ME and 3435 ME images from noncancerous lesions or normal esophagus were used as training image data. Validation was performed using 255 non-ME white-light images, 268 non-ME narrow-band images/blue-laser images, and 204 ME narrow-band images/blue-laser images from 135 patients. The same validation test data were diagnosed by 15 board-certified specialists (experienced endoscopists). Results: Regarding diagnosis by non-ME with narrow-band imaging/blue-laser imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100%, 63%, and 77%, respectively, for the artificial intelligence (AI) system and 92%, 69%, and 78%, respectively, for the experienced endoscopists. Regarding diagnosis by non-ME with white-light imaging, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 90%, 76%, and 81%, respectively, for the AI system and 87%, 67%, and 75%, respectively, for the experienced endoscopists. Regarding diagnosis by ME, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 98%, 56%, and 77%, respectively, for the AI system and 83%, 70%, and 76%, respectively, for the experienced endoscopists. There was no significant difference in the diagnostic performance between the AI system and the experienced endoscopists. Conclusions: Our AI system showed high sensitivity for detecting SCC by non-ME and high accuracy for differentiating SCC from noncancerous lesions by ME.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075999272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075999272&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2019.09.034
DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2019.09.034
M3 - Article
C2 - 31585124
AN - SCOPUS:85075999272
SN - 0016-5107
VL - 91
SP - 301-309.e1
JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
IS - 2
ER -