TY - JOUR
T1 - Endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting for hemodialysis vascular access creation in the forearm
T2 - A new approach for arteriovenous bridge graft
AU - Oto, Takahiro
PY - 2003/1/1
Y1 - 2003/1/1
N2 - When superficial arm veins are not suitable to create a native arteriovenous (AV) fistula, an arteriovenous bridge graft by native and/or prosthetic graft is the next best alternative. However, harvesting a native vein, such as the saphenous vein (SV), is invasive and requires a large incision. We report an endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting (ESVH) technique combined with forearm bridge grafting as a new approach for vascular access (VA). Methods: We used the Clearglide, Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting System (Eticon, Inc.) for a less invasive SV harvesting technique. Five patients had a SV graft implant and 10 patients had a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft implant in the forearm. Results: The SV was harvested easily in all patients in 46 ± 2 min. There were no wound complications. All SV and PTFE grafts provided satisfactory access within 1 month; however, two declotting procedures in the SV group and five in the PTFE group were required. The PTFE group had two graft infections. Conclusions: It is possible that a combination of ESVH and SV forearm grafting will be one of the new approaches for hemodialysis (HD) access.
AB - When superficial arm veins are not suitable to create a native arteriovenous (AV) fistula, an arteriovenous bridge graft by native and/or prosthetic graft is the next best alternative. However, harvesting a native vein, such as the saphenous vein (SV), is invasive and requires a large incision. We report an endoscopic saphenous vein harvesting (ESVH) technique combined with forearm bridge grafting as a new approach for vascular access (VA). Methods: We used the Clearglide, Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting System (Eticon, Inc.) for a less invasive SV harvesting technique. Five patients had a SV graft implant and 10 patients had a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft implant in the forearm. Results: The SV was harvested easily in all patients in 46 ± 2 min. There were no wound complications. All SV and PTFE grafts provided satisfactory access within 1 month; however, two declotting procedures in the SV group and five in the PTFE group were required. The PTFE group had two graft infections. Conclusions: It is possible that a combination of ESVH and SV forearm grafting will be one of the new approaches for hemodialysis (HD) access.
KW - Endoscopic harvest
KW - Hemodialysis
KW - Saphenous
KW - Vascular access
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242363133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242363133&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/112972980300400304
DO - 10.1177/112972980300400304
M3 - Article
C2 - 17639486
AN - SCOPUS:0242363133
SN - 1129-7298
VL - 4
SP - 98
EP - 101
JO - Journal of Vascular Access
JF - Journal of Vascular Access
IS - 3
ER -