TY - JOUR
T1 - Feasibility of genomic profiling with next-generation sequencing using specimens obtained by image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy
AU - Sone, Miyuki
AU - Arai, Yasuaki
AU - Sugawara, Shunsuke
AU - Kubo, Takatoshi
AU - Itou, Chihiro
AU - Hasegawa, Tetsuya
AU - Umakoshi, Noriyuki
AU - Yamamoto, Noboru
AU - Sunami, Kumiko
AU - Hiraoka, Nobuyoshi
AU - Kubo, Takashi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under the Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control Grant (16ck0106058h0003); the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan under Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant (H26-055); and National Cancer Center under the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (29-A-11).
Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) under the Practical Research for Innovative Cancer Control Grant (16ck0106058h0003); the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan under Health and Labor Sciences Research Grant (H26-055); and National Cancer Center under the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (29-A-11).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019, © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2019/4/3
Y1 - 2019/4/3
N2 - Aims: The demand for specimen collection for genomic profiling is rapidly increasing in the era of personalized medicine. Percutaneous needle biopsy is recognized as minimally invasive, but the feasibility of comprehensive genomic analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is not yet clear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of genomic analysis using NGS with specimens obtained by image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy with 18-G needles. Patients and methods: Forty-eight patients who participated in a clinical study of genomic profiling with NGS with the specimen obtained by image-guided needle biopsy were included. All biopsies were performed under local anesthesia, with imaging guidance, using an 18-G cutting needle. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine the rate of successful genomic analysis, technical success rate of biopsy procedure, adverse events, rate of success in pathological diagnosis, and cause of failed genomic analysis. Results: The success rate of genomic analysis was 79.2% (38/48). The causes of failure were unprocessed for DNA extraction due to insufficient specimen volume (6/10), insufficient DNA volume (2/10), and deteriorated DNA quality (2/10). The rate of successful genomic analysis excluding NGS analysis that failed for reasons unrelated to the biopsy procedures was 95.2% (40/42). Technical success of biopsy was achieved in all patients without severe adverse events. The rate of success in the pathological diagnosis was 97.9% (47/48). Conclusions: Image-guided needle biopsy specimens using an 18-G cutting needle yielded a successful NGS genomic analysis rate with no severe adverse events and could be an adoptable method for tissue sampling for NGS.
AB - Aims: The demand for specimen collection for genomic profiling is rapidly increasing in the era of personalized medicine. Percutaneous needle biopsy is recognized as minimally invasive, but the feasibility of comprehensive genomic analysis using next-generation sequencing (NGS) is not yet clear. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of genomic analysis using NGS with specimens obtained by image-guided percutaneous needle biopsy with 18-G needles. Patients and methods: Forty-eight patients who participated in a clinical study of genomic profiling with NGS with the specimen obtained by image-guided needle biopsy were included. All biopsies were performed under local anesthesia, with imaging guidance, using an 18-G cutting needle. A retrospective chart review was performed to determine the rate of successful genomic analysis, technical success rate of biopsy procedure, adverse events, rate of success in pathological diagnosis, and cause of failed genomic analysis. Results: The success rate of genomic analysis was 79.2% (38/48). The causes of failure were unprocessed for DNA extraction due to insufficient specimen volume (6/10), insufficient DNA volume (2/10), and deteriorated DNA quality (2/10). The rate of successful genomic analysis excluding NGS analysis that failed for reasons unrelated to the biopsy procedures was 95.2% (40/42). Technical success of biopsy was achieved in all patients without severe adverse events. The rate of success in the pathological diagnosis was 97.9% (47/48). Conclusions: Image-guided needle biopsy specimens using an 18-G cutting needle yielded a successful NGS genomic analysis rate with no severe adverse events and could be an adoptable method for tissue sampling for NGS.
KW - Biopsy
KW - genomic analysis
KW - needle biopsy
KW - next-generation sequencing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067536561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067536561&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/03009734.2019.1607635
DO - 10.1080/03009734.2019.1607635
M3 - Article
C2 - 31179853
AN - SCOPUS:85067536561
SN - 0300-9734
VL - 124
SP - 119
EP - 124
JO - Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences
JF - Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences
IS - 2
ER -