TY - JOUR
T1 - Flexural performance of flowable versus conventional light-cured composite resins in a long-term in vitro study
AU - Irie, Masao
AU - Tjandrawinata, Rosalina
AU - E.L., Lihua
AU - Yamashiro, Takashi
AU - Suzuki, Kazuomi
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength, flexural modulus, modulus of resilience, and water sorption of four flowable light-cured composite resins (FCRs). Results were then compared with four conventional composite resins (CCRs) and a minifilled hybrid light-cured composite resin, which served as a control. Twenty specimens were flexural tested immediately after curing, while others were stored in water at 37°C for 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, or 1 year before flexural testing. The 1-year specimens were weight-measured at designated time intervals to examine water sorption. All FCRs, except Point 4 Flowable, showed higher flexural strength values than their CCR counterparts (p<0.05, Scheffé's test). After one-year water storage, the flexural strengths and flexural moduli of FCRs increased 1.5-fold or more when compared with the immediate condition. In most cases, the moduli of resilience of FCRs were higher than those of CCRs. In conclusion, it was found that FCR and CCR with the same brand name had very different characteristics and mechanical properties.
AB - The purpose of this study was to evaluate the flexural strength, flexural modulus, modulus of resilience, and water sorption of four flowable light-cured composite resins (FCRs). Results were then compared with four conventional composite resins (CCRs) and a minifilled hybrid light-cured composite resin, which served as a control. Twenty specimens were flexural tested immediately after curing, while others were stored in water at 37°C for 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, or 1 year before flexural testing. The 1-year specimens were weight-measured at designated time intervals to examine water sorption. All FCRs, except Point 4 Flowable, showed higher flexural strength values than their CCR counterparts (p<0.05, Scheffé's test). After one-year water storage, the flexural strengths and flexural moduli of FCRs increased 1.5-fold or more when compared with the immediate condition. In most cases, the moduli of resilience of FCRs were higher than those of CCRs. In conclusion, it was found that FCR and CCR with the same brand name had very different characteristics and mechanical properties.
KW - Flowable composite
KW - Long-term durability
KW - Mechanical property
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=46349083350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=46349083350&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4012/dmj.27.300
DO - 10.4012/dmj.27.300
M3 - Article
C2 - 18540407
AN - SCOPUS:46349083350
SN - 0287-4547
VL - 27
SP - 300
EP - 309
JO - Dental Materials Journal
JF - Dental Materials Journal
IS - 2
ER -