TY - JOUR
T1 - Identification of social relation within pedestrian dyads
AU - Yucel, Zeynep
AU - Zanlungo, Francesco
AU - Feliciani, Claudio
AU - Gregorj, Adrien
AU - Kanda, Takayuki
N1 - Funding Information:
ZY is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number J18K18168, Funder: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, https://www. jsps.go.jp/english/. ZY is supported by WTT Startup Fund (No grant number available), Funder: Okayama University, http://www.okayama-u.ac.jp/ index_e.html. ZY is affiliated to Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International as visiting researcher to facilitate her collaboration with former colleagues, but does not receive a salary from this company. FZ is affiliated to Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International. FZ is supported by JST CREST Program Grant Number JPMJCR17A2, Funder: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/. CF is affiliated to The University of Tokyo. CF is supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25287026, Funder: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, https://www.jsps.go.jp/ english/. CF is supported by the Doctoral Student Special Incentives Program (SEUT RA) and the Foundation for Supporting International Students of the University of Tokyo, Funder: The University of Tokyo, https://www.u-Tokyo.ac.jp/en/index.html. AG was affiliated to Grenoble-INP Ensimag and Okayama University during the term of this research. AG was supported by WTT Startup Fund during the term of this research (No grant number available), Funder: Okayama University, http:// www.okayama-u.ac.jp/index_e.html. AG is currently a volunteer at OceaSciences association. TK is affiliated to Kyoto University. TK is affiliated to Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International. TK is supported by JST CREST Program Grant Number JPMJCR17A2, Funder: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, https://www.jsps.go.jp/english/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We would like to thank Dr. Akito Monden for his invaluable discussion. This work was supported by JST CREST Grant Number JPMJCR17A2, Japan. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number J18K18168, Japan.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Yucel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
PY - 2019/10/1
Y1 - 2019/10/1
N2 - This study focuses on social pedestrian groups in public spaces and makes an effort to identify the type of social relation between the group members. As a first step for this identification problem, we focus on dyads (i.e. 2 people groups). Moreover, as a mutually exclusive categorization of social relations, we consider the domain-based approach of Bugental, which precisely corresponds to social relations of colleagues, couples, friends and families, and identify each dyad with one of those relations. For this purpose, we use anonymized trajectory data and derive a set of observables thereof, namely, inter-personal distance, group velocity, velocity difference and height difference. Subsequently, we use the probability density functions (pdf) of these observables as a tool to understand the nature of the relation between pedestrians. To that end, we propose different ways of using the pdfs. Namely, we introduce a probabilistic Bayesian approach and contrast it to a functional metric one and evaluate the performance of both methods with appropriate assessment measures. This study stands out as the first attempt to automatically recognize social relation between pedestrian groups. Additionally, in doing that it uses completely anonymous data and proves that social relation is still possible to recognize with a good accuracy without invading privacy. In particular, our findings indicate that significant recognition rates can be attained for certain categories and with certain methods. Specifically, we show that a very good recognition rate is achieved in distinguishing colleagues from leisure-oriented dyads (families, couples and friends), whereas the distinction between the leisure-oriented dyads results to be inherently harder, but still possible at reasonable rates, in particular if families are restricted to parent-child groups. In general, we establish that the Bayesian method outperforms the functional metric one due, probably, to the difficulty of the latter to learn observable pdfs from individual trajectories.
AB - This study focuses on social pedestrian groups in public spaces and makes an effort to identify the type of social relation between the group members. As a first step for this identification problem, we focus on dyads (i.e. 2 people groups). Moreover, as a mutually exclusive categorization of social relations, we consider the domain-based approach of Bugental, which precisely corresponds to social relations of colleagues, couples, friends and families, and identify each dyad with one of those relations. For this purpose, we use anonymized trajectory data and derive a set of observables thereof, namely, inter-personal distance, group velocity, velocity difference and height difference. Subsequently, we use the probability density functions (pdf) of these observables as a tool to understand the nature of the relation between pedestrians. To that end, we propose different ways of using the pdfs. Namely, we introduce a probabilistic Bayesian approach and contrast it to a functional metric one and evaluate the performance of both methods with appropriate assessment measures. This study stands out as the first attempt to automatically recognize social relation between pedestrian groups. Additionally, in doing that it uses completely anonymous data and proves that social relation is still possible to recognize with a good accuracy without invading privacy. In particular, our findings indicate that significant recognition rates can be attained for certain categories and with certain methods. Specifically, we show that a very good recognition rate is achieved in distinguishing colleagues from leisure-oriented dyads (families, couples and friends), whereas the distinction between the leisure-oriented dyads results to be inherently harder, but still possible at reasonable rates, in particular if families are restricted to parent-child groups. In general, we establish that the Bayesian method outperforms the functional metric one due, probably, to the difficulty of the latter to learn observable pdfs from individual trajectories.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073533338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073533338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0223656
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0223656
M3 - Article
C2 - 31622383
AN - SCOPUS:85073533338
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 14
JO - PLoS One
JF - PLoS One
IS - 10
M1 - e0223656
ER -