TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
T2 - Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis
AU - Umeda, Yuzo
AU - Mitsuhashi, Toshiharu
AU - Kojima, Toru
AU - Satoh, Daisuke
AU - Sui, Kenta
AU - Endo, Yoshikatsu
AU - Inagaki, Masaru
AU - Oishi, Masahiro
AU - Yagi, Takahito
AU - Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Grant Number 19K09217 to YU.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) has been established as a critical risk factor for prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The clinical implications of lymph node dissection (LND) have been debated. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of LND by multicenter retrospective analysis. Methods: A total of 310 ICC patients who had undergone curative resection between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic impact of LND was estimated under an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach using propensity scores. Results: LND was performed for 224 patients (72%), with LNM pathologically confirmed in 90 patients (40%). Prognosis was poorer for patients with LNM (median survival, 16.9 months) than for those without (57.2 months; P <.0001). One-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates (OS) were comparable among LND+ (81.6%, 48.0%, and 37.5%, respectively) and LND– groups (81.6%, 55.4%, and 44.6%, respectively). However, advanced tumor, as characterized by larger tumor, multinodular lesions, and serosal invasion, was significantly more frequent in the LND+ group than in the LND– group. After IPTW adjusting for imbalances, 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were better in the LND+ group (83.5%, 52.2%, and 42.8%, respectively) than in the LND– group (71.9%, 32.4%, and 23.4%, respectively; P =.046). LND thus showed significant prognostic impact (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95%CI = |0.39|–|0.84|, P =.005), especially in hilar ICC. However, peripheral ICC displayed no therapeutic benefit from LND. Conclusions: LND could have a significant role to play in improving oncologic outcomes. Therapeutic LND should be implemented on the basis of tumor location and tumor advancement.
AB - Background: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) has been established as a critical risk factor for prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The clinical implications of lymph node dissection (LND) have been debated. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of LND by multicenter retrospective analysis. Methods: A total of 310 ICC patients who had undergone curative resection between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic impact of LND was estimated under an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach using propensity scores. Results: LND was performed for 224 patients (72%), with LNM pathologically confirmed in 90 patients (40%). Prognosis was poorer for patients with LNM (median survival, 16.9 months) than for those without (57.2 months; P <.0001). One-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates (OS) were comparable among LND+ (81.6%, 48.0%, and 37.5%, respectively) and LND– groups (81.6%, 55.4%, and 44.6%, respectively). However, advanced tumor, as characterized by larger tumor, multinodular lesions, and serosal invasion, was significantly more frequent in the LND+ group than in the LND– group. After IPTW adjusting for imbalances, 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were better in the LND+ group (83.5%, 52.2%, and 42.8%, respectively) than in the LND– group (71.9%, 32.4%, and 23.4%, respectively; P =.046). LND thus showed significant prognostic impact (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95%CI = |0.39|–|0.84|, P =.005), especially in hilar ICC. However, peripheral ICC displayed no therapeutic benefit from LND. Conclusions: LND could have a significant role to play in improving oncologic outcomes. Therapeutic LND should be implemented on the basis of tumor location and tumor advancement.
KW - intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
KW - lymph node excision
KW - multicenter study
KW - propensity score
KW - retrospective studies
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85115064869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85115064869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/jhbp.1038
DO - 10.1002/jhbp.1038
M3 - Article
C2 - 34473411
AN - SCOPUS:85115064869
SN - 1868-6974
JO - Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
JF - Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences
ER -