In vitro antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability of the new carbapenem SM-7338

Y. Sumita, M. Inoue, S. Mitsuhashi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)


The in vitro activity of the new carbapenem SM-7338 was tested in comparison with imipenem, ceftazidime, cefotaxime, flomoxef, cefuzonam and cefmetazole against 2850 clinical bacterial isolates. SM-7338 showed good activity against a broad spectrum of grampositive and gram-negative bacteria. SM-7338 was very active against gram-negative bacteria, inhibiting all Enterobacteriaceae, except 25 % of Serratia marcescens isolates, at a concentration of 0.78 mg/l. SM-7338 inhibited the majority of Pseudomonas spp. at concentrations of ≤ 3.13 mg/l, its activity being twofold higher than that of imipenem. However, the activity of SM-7338 against gram-positive cocci was about one-fourth that of imipenem. Against anaerobes, SM-7338 also had the best activity of the β-lactams tested. The compound was inactive against methicillin-resistant staphylococci, Enterococcus faecium, Xanthomonas maltophilia and Flavobacterium spp., as were the other β-lactams. SM-7338 was quite stable in the presence of various types of β-lactamase, but was hydrolyzed by Xanthomonas maltophilia β-lactamase, as was imipenem. This high degree of stability was responsible for the potent activity of SM-7388 against β-lactamase-producing species such as Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii and Proteus vulgaris. SM-7338 also showed bactericidal activity against clinical isolates at the MIC or at concentrations slightly above the MIC.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)908-916
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Issue number10
Publication statusPublished - Oct 1 1989

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Infectious Diseases


Dive into the research topics of 'In vitro antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability of the new carbapenem SM-7338'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this