TY - JOUR
T1 - In Vitro Efficacy of Meropenem-Cefmetazole Combination Therapy against New Delhi Metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae
AU - Hagiya, Hideharu
AU - Sugawara, Yo
AU - Tsutsumi, Yuko
AU - Akeda, Yukihiro
AU - Yamamoto, Norihisa
AU - Sakamoto, Noriko
AU - Shanmugakani, Rathina Kumar
AU - Abe, Ryuichiro
AU - Takeuchi, Dan
AU - Nishi, Isao
AU - Ishii, Yoshikazu
AU - Hamada, Shigeyuki
AU - Tomono, Kazunori
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 15K19585, 17K16223).
Funding Information:
We are grateful to Ms. Hiroko Omori, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Japan, for her technical assistance. Funding: This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 15K19585, 17K16223). Competing Interests: Yuko Tsutsumi is an employee of Meiji Seika Pharma Co. Ltd, Pharmaceutical Research Center, Yokohama, Japan. Ethical Approval: Not required. Author contributions: Data acquisition: H. Hagiya, Y. Sugawara, Y. Tsutsumi, N. Yamamoto, N. Sakamoto, R. Abe, and I. Nishi. Drafting of manuscript: H. Hagiya. Critical revision: Y. Akeda, RK. Shanmugakani, D. Takeuchi Y. Ishii, S. Hamada, and K. Tomono
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Background: Limited treatment options complicate management of infections with New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing organisms. The efficacy of combination therapy with meropenem (MEM) and cefmetazole (CMZ) was assessed against NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Materials and Methods: Twelve Escherichia coli clinical isolates harbouring blaNDM-1 and a positive control E. coli BAA-2469 harbouring blaNDM-1 were studied. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of MEM, ertapenem (ERT) and CMZ were determined by broth microdilution. Checkerboard and time-kill assays were performed to confirm the in vitro efficacy of the MEM/CMZ combination. Scanning electron microscopy, kinetic studies and whole-genome sequence analysis were used to determine the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Results: MICs of MEM, ERT and CMZ in monotherapy ranged from 8 to 32, 16 to 128, and 32 to 512 µg/mL, respectively. In the checkerboard assay, MEM/ERT resulted in no synergy, whereas MEM/CMZ showed a synergistic effect in all the tested isolates. Furthermore, the MIC of MEM in combination decreased by 2- to 8-fold compared with that of MEM alone. The time-kill study revealed a bactericidal effect in 4 of 13 isolates at 24 h. Scanning electron microscopy showed spheroidisation of the bacterial cell in the MEM/CMZ combination; this was not observed in single antibiotic conditions. Kinetic studies indicated CMZ was a better antagonist for NDM-1 than ERT. Whole-genome sequence analysis did not reveal any explainable differences between isolates susceptible and those non-susceptible to combination therapy. Conclusion: In vitro studies showed the potential effectiveness of MEM/CMZ combination therapy against NDM-producing organisms.
AB - Background: Limited treatment options complicate management of infections with New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing organisms. The efficacy of combination therapy with meropenem (MEM) and cefmetazole (CMZ) was assessed against NDM-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Materials and Methods: Twelve Escherichia coli clinical isolates harbouring blaNDM-1 and a positive control E. coli BAA-2469 harbouring blaNDM-1 were studied. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of MEM, ertapenem (ERT) and CMZ were determined by broth microdilution. Checkerboard and time-kill assays were performed to confirm the in vitro efficacy of the MEM/CMZ combination. Scanning electron microscopy, kinetic studies and whole-genome sequence analysis were used to determine the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Results: MICs of MEM, ERT and CMZ in monotherapy ranged from 8 to 32, 16 to 128, and 32 to 512 µg/mL, respectively. In the checkerboard assay, MEM/ERT resulted in no synergy, whereas MEM/CMZ showed a synergistic effect in all the tested isolates. Furthermore, the MIC of MEM in combination decreased by 2- to 8-fold compared with that of MEM alone. The time-kill study revealed a bactericidal effect in 4 of 13 isolates at 24 h. Scanning electron microscopy showed spheroidisation of the bacterial cell in the MEM/CMZ combination; this was not observed in single antibiotic conditions. Kinetic studies indicated CMZ was a better antagonist for NDM-1 than ERT. Whole-genome sequence analysis did not reveal any explainable differences between isolates susceptible and those non-susceptible to combination therapy. Conclusion: In vitro studies showed the potential effectiveness of MEM/CMZ combination therapy against NDM-producing organisms.
KW - carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
KW - carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae
KW - cefmetazole
KW - cephamycin
KW - combination therapy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85079543831&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85079543831&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105905
DO - 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105905
M3 - Article
C2 - 31991221
AN - SCOPUS:85079543831
SN - 0924-8579
VL - 55
JO - International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
JF - International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
IS - 3
M1 - 105905
ER -