TY - JOUR
T1 - Inter-individual variability in atrasentan exposure partly explains variability in kidney protection and fluid retention responses
T2 - A post hoc analysis of the SONAR trial
AU - Koomen, Jeroen V.
AU - Stevens, Jasper
AU - Bakris, George
AU - Correa-Rotter, Ricardo
AU - Hou, Fan Fan
AU - Kitzman, Dalane W.
AU - Kohan, Donald
AU - Makino, Hirofumi
AU - McMurray, John J.V.
AU - Parving, Hans Henrik
AU - Perkovic, Vlado
AU - Tobe, Sheldon W.
AU - de Zeeuw, Dick
AU - Heerspink, Hiddo J.L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek, Grant/Award Number: 917.15.306; Novo Nordisk UK Research Foundation, Grant/Award Number: NNF OC0013659; The SONAR trial was funded by AbbVie Funding information
Funding Information:
JVK, JJVM and JS have no competing interests. HJLH is a consultant to AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Chinook, CSL Behring, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, Mundipharma, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novo Nordisk and Retrophin. He received research support from AstraZeneca, AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim and Janssen. DEK is a consultant to AbbVie, Chinook, Janssen and Retrophin. RCR is consultant for AstraZeneca, Novonordisk, Janssen, Boehringer Ingelheim and has been a speaker for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Takeda, Amgen, and Janssen. He received research support from AstraZeneca, AbbVie and GSK. GB is a consultant for Bayer, Relypsa, Janssen, Merck and Vascular Dynamics. RCR serves on advisory boards for Boehringer and AstraZeneca and has been a speaker for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, AbbVie, Takeda, Amgen and Janssen. FFH is a consultant for and has received honoraria from AbbVie and AstraZeneca. DWK received grant funding from Bayer, Novartis and the National Institutes of Health, and has been a consultant for AbbVie, Bayer, Merck, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia, CinRx, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Duke Clinical Research Institute, St Luke's Medical Center and AstraZeneca. HM is a consultant for AbbVie, Boehringer‐ingelheim and Teijin Pharma. VP has served on Steering Committees for trials funded by AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, Janssen, Novo Nordisk, Retrophin and Tricida; and has participated in scientific presentations or advisory boards with AbbVie, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Baxter, Brisol‐Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dimerix, Durect, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Merck, Mitsubishi Tanabe, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Pharmalink, Relypsa, Retrophin, Sanofi, Servier and Tricida. ST participates on a steering committee for Bayer Fidelio/Figaro studies, and speaker's bureaux with Servier and Pfizer. DdZ serves on advisory boards or is a speaker for Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Fresenius, Mundipharma and Mitsubishi Tanabe; participates in steering committees or is a speaker for AbbVie and Janssen; and is on the data safety and monitoring committees for Bayer. H‐HP serves as a consultant for AbbVie.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank all the patients and investigators who participated in the SONAR trial. JS is supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF OC0013659). HJLH is supported by a VIDI grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (917.15.306). The SONAR trial was funded by AbbVie.
Funding Information:
We would like to thank all the patients and investigators who participated in the SONAR trial. JS is supported by a grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation (grant number NNF OC0013659). HJLH is supported by a VIDI grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (917.15.306). The SONAR trial was funded by AbbVie.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Aim: To evaluate whether atrasentan plasma exposure explains between-patient variability in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) response, a surrogate for kidney protection, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) response, a surrogate for fluid expansion. Methods: Type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (n = 4775) received 0.75 mg atrasentan for 6 weeks in the active run-in period. Individual area under the concentration-time-curve (AUC) was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model. The association between atrasentan AUC, other clinical characteristics, and UACR and BNP response, was estimated using linear regression. Results: The median atrasentan AUC was 43.8 ng.h/mL with a large variation among patients (2.5th-97.5th percentiles [P]: 12.6 to 197.5 ng.h/mL). Median UACR change at the end of enrichment was −36.0% and median BNP change was 8.7%, which also varied among patients (UACR, 2.5th-97.5th P: −76.2% to 44.5%; BNP, 2.5th-97.5th P: −71.5% to 300.0%). In the multivariable analysis, higher atrasentan AUC was associated with greater UACR reduction (4.88% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% confidence interval {CI}: 6.21% to 3.52%], P <.01) and greater BNP increase (3.08% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% CI: 1.12% to 4.11%], P <.01) independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate, haemoglobin or BNP. Caucasian patients compared with black patients had greater UACR reduction (7.06% [95% CI: 1.38% to 13.07%]) and also greater BNP increase (8.75% [95% CI: 1.65% to 15.35%]). UACR response was not associated with BNP response (r = 0.06). Conclusion: Atrasentan plasma exposure varied among individual patients and partially explained between-patient variability in efficacy and safety response.
AB - Aim: To evaluate whether atrasentan plasma exposure explains between-patient variability in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) response, a surrogate for kidney protection, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) response, a surrogate for fluid expansion. Methods: Type 2 diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (n = 4775) received 0.75 mg atrasentan for 6 weeks in the active run-in period. Individual area under the concentration-time-curve (AUC) was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model. The association between atrasentan AUC, other clinical characteristics, and UACR and BNP response, was estimated using linear regression. Results: The median atrasentan AUC was 43.8 ng.h/mL with a large variation among patients (2.5th-97.5th percentiles [P]: 12.6 to 197.5 ng.h/mL). Median UACR change at the end of enrichment was −36.0% and median BNP change was 8.7%, which also varied among patients (UACR, 2.5th-97.5th P: −76.2% to 44.5%; BNP, 2.5th-97.5th P: −71.5% to 300.0%). In the multivariable analysis, higher atrasentan AUC was associated with greater UACR reduction (4.88% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% confidence interval {CI}: 6.21% to 3.52%], P <.01) and greater BNP increase (3.08% per doubling in ng.h/mL [95% CI: 1.12% to 4.11%], P <.01) independent of estimated glomerular filtration rate, haemoglobin or BNP. Caucasian patients compared with black patients had greater UACR reduction (7.06% [95% CI: 1.38% to 13.07%]) and also greater BNP increase (8.75% [95% CI: 1.65% to 15.35%]). UACR response was not associated with BNP response (r = 0.06). Conclusion: Atrasentan plasma exposure varied among individual patients and partially explained between-patient variability in efficacy and safety response.
KW - atrasentan, diabetic kidney disease, endothelin receptor antagonist, pharmacodynamics, randomized controlled trial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85096657462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85096657462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/dom.14252
DO - 10.1111/dom.14252
M3 - Article
C2 - 33184931
AN - SCOPUS:85096657462
SN - 1462-8902
VL - 23
SP - 561
EP - 568
JO - Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
JF - Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
IS - 2
ER -