TY - JOUR
T1 - Intrathoracic Impedance Is Negatively Correlated with BNP Value in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator
T2 - MOMOTARO Study
AU - Watanabe, Atsuyuki
AU - Nishii, Nobuhiro
AU - Okamoto, Yoji
AU - Fujii, Satoki
AU - Wada, Tadashi
AU - Kubo, Motoki
AU - Morita, Hiroshi
AU - Fukushima, Kengo
AU - Ito, Hiroshi
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2017 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - Introduction: Heart failure is one of the most common causes for hospitalizations. OptiVol alert, which was fluid status algorism calculated from intrathoracic impedance, may detect impending fluid accumulation. Then, we tried to examine the relationship of OptiVol alert or intrathoracic impedance with various parameters. Methods: The patients who were implanted high energy device with OptiVol feature were included in this study. The patients were evaluated various examinations at enrolment and following an OptiVol alert. We examined how various parameters were different between baseline and OptiVol alert. and the relationships among the factors included in OptiVol alert and intrathoracic impedance were evaluated by factor analysis. Results: From April in 2010, 191 patients were eligible for the present study. In all patients, there was no significant difference in all parameters between OptiVol alert and baseline. However, in the patients with ejection fraction less than 35%, BNP value was likely to increase in OptiVol alert compared with that in baseline, but not significantly. In factor analysis, there was no parameter correlated with OptiVol alert. However, intrathoracic impedance was negatively correlated with BNP value. Conclusions: Intrathoracic impedance, but OptiVol alert, seems to represent fluid retention.
AB - Introduction: Heart failure is one of the most common causes for hospitalizations. OptiVol alert, which was fluid status algorism calculated from intrathoracic impedance, may detect impending fluid accumulation. Then, we tried to examine the relationship of OptiVol alert or intrathoracic impedance with various parameters. Methods: The patients who were implanted high energy device with OptiVol feature were included in this study. The patients were evaluated various examinations at enrolment and following an OptiVol alert. We examined how various parameters were different between baseline and OptiVol alert. and the relationships among the factors included in OptiVol alert and intrathoracic impedance were evaluated by factor analysis. Results: From April in 2010, 191 patients were eligible for the present study. In all patients, there was no significant difference in all parameters between OptiVol alert and baseline. However, in the patients with ejection fraction less than 35%, BNP value was likely to increase in OptiVol alert compared with that in baseline, but not significantly. In factor analysis, there was no parameter correlated with OptiVol alert. However, intrathoracic impedance was negatively correlated with BNP value. Conclusions: Intrathoracic impedance, but OptiVol alert, seems to represent fluid retention.
KW - heart failure
KW - remote monitoring
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85008729347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85008729347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4020/jhrs.27.PJ2_053
DO - 10.4020/jhrs.27.PJ2_053
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85008729347
SN - 1880-4276
VL - 27
SP - 299
JO - journal of arrhythmia
JF - journal of arrhythmia
IS - 4
ER -