TY - JOUR
T1 - Is cryoablation a valid option for renal cell carcinomas in direct contact with critical organs?
AU - Nagata, Shoma
AU - Matsui, Yusuke
AU - Tomita, Koji
AU - Uka, Mayu
AU - Kawabata, Takahiro
AU - Umakoshi, Noriyuki
AU - Munetomo, Kazuaki
AU - Kawada, Maria
AU - Iguchi, Toshihiro
AU - Hiraki, Takao
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Society of Medical Innovation and Technology.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) contacting critical organs without intervening fat tissue. Material and methods: Twenty-three patients with 24 RCCs (mean size, 28.8 mm) contacting critical organs on preprocedural images were included. The organ displacement techniques, technical success, efficacy, and adverse events per Clavien–Dindo classification were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The organs contacting the RCCs included the colon (n = 16), pancreas (n = 3), duodenum (n = 3), small intestine (n = 1), and stomach (n = 1). In all procedures, hydrodissection was conducted, and probe traction was additionally utilized in one to displace organs. Two procedures were terminated with an insufficient ice-ball margin (<6 mm) due to recurring proximity of the colon or thermal sink effect by renal hilar vessels, yielding a technical success rate of 91.6% (22/24). No severe adverse events were noted. All patients were alive without any metastases during a median follow-up of 34.4 months. The primary and secondary technical efficacy rates were 91.6% (22/24) and 95.8% (23/24) of tumors, respectively. Conclusion: PCA can be a valid option for RCCs contacting critical organs with a good safety profile and sufficient technical efficacy.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed to assess the outcomes of percutaneous cryoablation (PCA) for renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) contacting critical organs without intervening fat tissue. Material and methods: Twenty-three patients with 24 RCCs (mean size, 28.8 mm) contacting critical organs on preprocedural images were included. The organ displacement techniques, technical success, efficacy, and adverse events per Clavien–Dindo classification were retrospectively reviewed. Results: The organs contacting the RCCs included the colon (n = 16), pancreas (n = 3), duodenum (n = 3), small intestine (n = 1), and stomach (n = 1). In all procedures, hydrodissection was conducted, and probe traction was additionally utilized in one to displace organs. Two procedures were terminated with an insufficient ice-ball margin (<6 mm) due to recurring proximity of the colon or thermal sink effect by renal hilar vessels, yielding a technical success rate of 91.6% (22/24). No severe adverse events were noted. All patients were alive without any metastases during a median follow-up of 34.4 months. The primary and secondary technical efficacy rates were 91.6% (22/24) and 95.8% (23/24) of tumors, respectively. Conclusion: PCA can be a valid option for RCCs contacting critical organs with a good safety profile and sufficient technical efficacy.
KW - Cryoablation
KW - cryoinjury
KW - displacement technique
KW - hydrodissection
KW - renal cell carcinoma
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85193515636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85193515636&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13645706.2024.2354332
DO - 10.1080/13645706.2024.2354332
M3 - Article
C2 - 38757702
AN - SCOPUS:85193515636
SN - 1364-5706
JO - Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies
JF - Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies
ER -