TY - JOUR
T1 - Knowledge flows from business method software patents
T2 - influence of firms’ global social networks
AU - Jiang, Jiaming
AU - Goel, Rajeev K.
AU - Zhang, Xingyuan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Copyright:
Copyright 2019 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2019/8/1
Y1 - 2019/8/1
N2 - Using patent citations as an indicator of knowledge flows, this paper examines the effects of firms’ global patent social networks on knowledge flows from business method software patents. Patent social networks are considered along several dimensions, including relative centrality, structural equivalence and brokerage roles. Identifying 19,385 software patents applications to the USPTO by 37 countries during 1995–2012, results show that firms positioned with a relative centrality or situated within the same structural equivalent cluster have more citations to their counterpart firms’ patents. Further, among the different brokerage roles, we find positive promotion to knowledge transfer when the citing and cited firms both serve the role of an itinerant as well as that of a gatekeeper/representative, while firms that act as gatekeeper/representative (alone) cite less patents from firms that do not enact this kind of a role. These unique insights provide a better understanding of channels of knowledge transmission and have implications for the pace of technological change.
AB - Using patent citations as an indicator of knowledge flows, this paper examines the effects of firms’ global patent social networks on knowledge flows from business method software patents. Patent social networks are considered along several dimensions, including relative centrality, structural equivalence and brokerage roles. Identifying 19,385 software patents applications to the USPTO by 37 countries during 1995–2012, results show that firms positioned with a relative centrality or situated within the same structural equivalent cluster have more citations to their counterpart firms’ patents. Further, among the different brokerage roles, we find positive promotion to knowledge transfer when the citing and cited firms both serve the role of an itinerant as well as that of a gatekeeper/representative, while firms that act as gatekeeper/representative (alone) cite less patents from firms that do not enact this kind of a role. These unique insights provide a better understanding of channels of knowledge transmission and have implications for the pace of technological change.
KW - Brokerage roles
KW - Business method patents
KW - Joint patent application
KW - Knowledge flows
KW - Patent citations
KW - Relative centrality
KW - Social networks
KW - Structural equivalence
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037648672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037648672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10961-017-9645-1
DO - 10.1007/s10961-017-9645-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85037648672
SN - 0892-9912
VL - 44
SP - 1070
EP - 1096
JO - Journal of Technology Transfer
JF - Journal of Technology Transfer
IS - 4
ER -