TY - JOUR
T1 - Laboratory and clinical studies of loracarbef
AU - Irabu, Yuei
AU - Inadome, Jun
AU - Fukuhara, Hiroshi
AU - Nakamura, Hiroaki
AU - Kaneshima, Hiroshi
AU - Shimoji, Katsuyoshi
AU - Kitsukawa, Keizou
AU - Shigeno, Yoshiteru
AU - Saito, Atsushi
AU - Furugen, Kyouko
AU - Nakasone, Isamu
AU - Taira, Shinko
AU - Kusano, Nobutika
AU - Hokama, Seitetsu
AU - Hokama, Tyoutetsu
PY - 1993
Y1 - 1993
N2 - We performed bacteriological and clinical evaluations of loracarbef (LCBF), a new oral carbacephem, in respiratory tract infections, with the following results. 1) Antimicrobial activity: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of LCBF were measured in 302 clinically isolated strains, and compared with those of cefaclor, cefotiam, cefixime, cefteram and amoxicillin, using the MIC-2000 system. LCBF had wide antimicrobial activity against clinically isolated strains except methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 2) Clinical efficacy: LCBF, 200 mg X 3 (600 mg/day), was administered to 4 patients with chronic bronchitis, 5 with acute bronchitis, one with acute pharyngitis, 2 with acute tonsillitis and one with acute pneumonia. Clinical response was excellent in one patient, good in 9, fair in 2, and poor in one. Clinical efficacy was 77%. Three of 4 strains of Haemophilus influenzae were eradicated. One strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were eradicated. Two strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae and one strain of Moraxella catarrhalis were isolated as superinfections. One strain of P. aeruginosa was isolated as a causative organism, but was not eradicated. Side effects were not observed, but mildly abnormal laboratory findings were noted in one patient.
AB - We performed bacteriological and clinical evaluations of loracarbef (LCBF), a new oral carbacephem, in respiratory tract infections, with the following results. 1) Antimicrobial activity: The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of LCBF were measured in 302 clinically isolated strains, and compared with those of cefaclor, cefotiam, cefixime, cefteram and amoxicillin, using the MIC-2000 system. LCBF had wide antimicrobial activity against clinically isolated strains except methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 2) Clinical efficacy: LCBF, 200 mg X 3 (600 mg/day), was administered to 4 patients with chronic bronchitis, 5 with acute bronchitis, one with acute pharyngitis, 2 with acute tonsillitis and one with acute pneumonia. Clinical response was excellent in one patient, good in 9, fair in 2, and poor in one. Clinical efficacy was 77%. Three of 4 strains of Haemophilus influenzae were eradicated. One strain of Streptococcus pneumoniae and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus were eradicated. Two strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae and one strain of Moraxella catarrhalis were isolated as superinfections. One strain of P. aeruginosa was isolated as a causative organism, but was not eradicated. Side effects were not observed, but mildly abnormal laboratory findings were noted in one patient.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0027451040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0027451040&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11250/chemotherapy1953.41.Supplement3_260
DO - 10.11250/chemotherapy1953.41.Supplement3_260
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0027451040
SN - 0009-3165
VL - 41
SP - 260
EP - 266
JO - CHEMOTHERAPY
JF - CHEMOTHERAPY
ER -