TY - JOUR
T1 - Learning from an unsuccessful study idea
T2 - Reflection and application of innovative techniques to prevent future failures
AU - Fujihara, Yuki
AU - Saito, Taichi
AU - Huetteman, Helen E.
AU - Sterbenz, Jennifer M.
AU - Chung, Kevin C.
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by a Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research (2 K24-AR053120-06) (to K.C.C.). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
PY - 2018/4
Y1 - 2018/4
N2 - A well-organized, thoughtful study design is essential for creating an impactful study. However, pressures promoting high output from researchers can lead to rushed study proposals that overlook critical weaknesses in the study design that can affect the validity of the conclusions. Researchers can benefit from thorough review of past failed proposals when crafting new research ideas. Conceptual frameworks and root cause analysis are two innovative techniques that can be used during study development to identify flaws and prevent study failures. In addition, conceptual frameworks and root cause analysis can be combined to complement each other to provide both a big picture and detailed view of a study proposal. This article describes these two common analytical methods and provides an example of how they can be used to evaluate and improve a study design by critically examining a previous failed research idea.
AB - A well-organized, thoughtful study design is essential for creating an impactful study. However, pressures promoting high output from researchers can lead to rushed study proposals that overlook critical weaknesses in the study design that can affect the validity of the conclusions. Researchers can benefit from thorough review of past failed proposals when crafting new research ideas. Conceptual frameworks and root cause analysis are two innovative techniques that can be used during study development to identify flaws and prevent study failures. In addition, conceptual frameworks and root cause analysis can be combined to complement each other to provide both a big picture and detailed view of a study proposal. This article describes these two common analytical methods and provides an example of how they can be used to evaluate and improve a study design by critically examining a previous failed research idea.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052844412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85052844412&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004246
DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004246
M3 - Article
C2 - 29595741
AN - SCOPUS:85052844412
SN - 0032-1052
VL - 141
SP - 1056
EP - 1062
JO - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
JF - Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
IS - 4
ER -