Abstract
The present paper argues that Nishigauchi's (1990) argument for an LF Subjacency Condition is incorrect. It is argued that the relevant facts should be accounted for in terms of a condition on LF representations, which I call the Minimal Scope Principle. My argument crucially depends on the assumption, advanced by Saito (1992), that scrambling can be undone at LF. The large-scale pied-piping hypothesis advanced by Nishigauchi (1990) is also examined and shown to be correct in the light of the Minimal Scope Principle and Takahashi's (1993) economy condition.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 371-402 |
Number of pages | 32 |
Journal | Natural Language and Linguistic Theory |
Volume | 17 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 1999 |
Externally published | Yes |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Language and Linguistics
- Linguistics and Language