TY - JOUR
T1 - Macroscopic and microscopic dynamics of a pedestrian cross-flow
T2 - Part II, modelling
AU - Zanlungo, Francesco
AU - Feliciani, Claudio
AU - Yücel, Zeynep
AU - Nishinari, Katsuhiro
AU - Kanda, Takayuki
N1 - Funding Information:
This research work was in part supported by: JSPS, Japan KAKENHI Grant Number 18H04121 , JSPS, Japan KAKENHI Grant Number 20K14992 , JST-Mirai Program, Japan Grant Number JPMJMI20D1 , JST Moonshot, Japan Grant Number JPMJMS2011 . We thank Kazuki Maeda of The University of Fukuchiyama for a valuable suggestion on how to improve the quality of graphical functions in our shared code.
Funding Information:
This research work was in part supported by: JSPS, Japan KAKENHI Grant Number 18H04121, JSPS, Japan KAKENHI Grant Number 20K14992, JST-Mirai Program, Japan Grant Number JPMJMI20D1, JST Moonshot, Japan Grant Number JPMJMS2011. We thank Kazuki Maeda of The University of Fukuchiyama for a valuable suggestion on how to improve the quality of graphical functions in our shared code. This research work was in part supported by: JSPS, Japan KAKENHI Grant Number 18H04121, JSPS, Japan KAKENHI Grant Number 20K14992, JST-Mirai Program, Japan Grant Number JPMJMI20D1. The funding sources had no involvement in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication. Experimental procedures were approved by the Ethical Commission of The University of Tokyo (approval number 19-274) and conform with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants received clear information on the nature of the research, methods employed and disclosed data. After a briefing, they gave written permission for participation and data acquisition and received a remuneration in accordance to the university's policies.
Funding Information:
This research work was in part supported by: JSPS, Japan KAKENHI Grant Number 18H04121 , JSPS, Japan KAKENHI Grant Number 20K14992 , JST-Mirai Program, Japan Grant Number JPMJMI20D1 . The funding sources had no involvement in study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/2
Y1 - 2023/2
N2 - In this work, we try to reproduce empirical results concerning the behaviour of a human crowd in a cross-flow using a hierarchy of models, which differ in the details of the body shape (using a disk-shaped body vs a more realistic elliptical shape) and in how collision avoiding is performed (using only information regarding “centre of mass” distance and velocity, or actually introducing body shape information). We verified that the most detailed model (i.e., using body shape information and an elliptical body) outperforms in a significant way the simplest one (using only centre of mass distance and velocity, and disk-shaped bodies). Furthermore, we observed that if elliptical bodies are introduced without introducing such information in collision avoidance, the performance of the model is relatively poor. Nevertheless, the difference between the different models is relevant only in describing the “tails” of the observable distributions, suggesting that the more complex models could be of practical use only in the description of high density settings. Although we did not calibrate our model in order to reproduce “stripe formation” self-organising patterns observed in the crossing area, we verified that they emerge naturally in all models.
AB - In this work, we try to reproduce empirical results concerning the behaviour of a human crowd in a cross-flow using a hierarchy of models, which differ in the details of the body shape (using a disk-shaped body vs a more realistic elliptical shape) and in how collision avoiding is performed (using only information regarding “centre of mass” distance and velocity, or actually introducing body shape information). We verified that the most detailed model (i.e., using body shape information and an elliptical body) outperforms in a significant way the simplest one (using only centre of mass distance and velocity, and disk-shaped bodies). Furthermore, we observed that if elliptical bodies are introduced without introducing such information in collision avoidance, the performance of the model is relatively poor. Nevertheless, the difference between the different models is relevant only in describing the “tails” of the observable distributions, suggesting that the more complex models could be of practical use only in the description of high density settings. Although we did not calibrate our model in order to reproduce “stripe formation” self-organising patterns observed in the crossing area, we verified that they emerge naturally in all models.
KW - Body orientation
KW - Cross-flow
KW - Pedestrian dynamics
KW - Self-organising patterns
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140900981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85140900981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105969
DO - 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.105969
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85140900981
SN - 0925-7535
VL - 158
JO - Journal of Occupational Accidents
JF - Journal of Occupational Accidents
M1 - 105969
ER -