TY - JOUR
T1 - Medial meniscus posterior root repairs
T2 - A comparison among three surgical techniques in short-term clinical outcomes and arthroscopic meniscal healing scores
AU - Furumatsu, Takayuki
AU - Hiranaka, Takaaki
AU - Okazaki, Yuki
AU - Kintaka, Keisuke
AU - Kodama, Yuya
AU - Kamatsuki, Yusuke
AU - Ozaki, Toshifumi
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was partly supported by a grant from the Stryker Academic Contribution Program (TF) and a grant from the Smith & Nephew , USA.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Background: Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root repairs lead to favorable clinical outcomes in patients with MM posterior root tears (MMPRTs). However, there are few comparative studies in evaluating the superiority among several pullout repair techniques such as modified Mason–Allen suture, simple stitch, and concomitant posteromedial pullout repair. We hypothesized that an additional pullout suture at the MM posteromedial part would have clinical advantages in transtibial pullout repairs of the MMPRTs. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical usefulness among several types of pullout repair techniques in patients with MMPRTs. Methods: Eighty-three patients who underwent arthroscopic pullout repairs of the MMPRTs were investigated. Patients were divided into three groups using different pullout repair techniques: a modified Mason–Allen suture using FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device (F-MMA, n = 28), two simple stitches (TSS, n = 30), and TSS concomitant with posteromedial pullout repair using all-inside meniscal repair device (TSS-PM, n = 25). Postoperative clinical outcomes and semi-quantitative arthroscopic meniscal healing scores (0–10 points) were evaluated at second-look arthroscopies. Results: No significant differences among the three groups were observed in patient demographics and preoperative clinical scores, except for preoperative Lysholm scores. At second-look arthroscopies, there were no significant differences among the three techniques in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healing scores. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the TSS-PM pullout repair technique did not show better scores in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healings compared with the F-MMA and TSS techniques. Our results suggest that the concomitant posteromedial pullout suture may have no clinical advantage in the conventional pullout repairs for the patients with MMPRTs.
AB - Background: Medial meniscus (MM) posterior root repairs lead to favorable clinical outcomes in patients with MM posterior root tears (MMPRTs). However, there are few comparative studies in evaluating the superiority among several pullout repair techniques such as modified Mason–Allen suture, simple stitch, and concomitant posteromedial pullout repair. We hypothesized that an additional pullout suture at the MM posteromedial part would have clinical advantages in transtibial pullout repairs of the MMPRTs. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical usefulness among several types of pullout repair techniques in patients with MMPRTs. Methods: Eighty-three patients who underwent arthroscopic pullout repairs of the MMPRTs were investigated. Patients were divided into three groups using different pullout repair techniques: a modified Mason–Allen suture using FasT-Fix all-inside meniscal repair device (F-MMA, n = 28), two simple stitches (TSS, n = 30), and TSS concomitant with posteromedial pullout repair using all-inside meniscal repair device (TSS-PM, n = 25). Postoperative clinical outcomes and semi-quantitative arthroscopic meniscal healing scores (0–10 points) were evaluated at second-look arthroscopies. Results: No significant differences among the three groups were observed in patient demographics and preoperative clinical scores, except for preoperative Lysholm scores. At second-look arthroscopies, there were no significant differences among the three techniques in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healing scores. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the TSS-PM pullout repair technique did not show better scores in postoperative clinical outcomes and meniscal healings compared with the F-MMA and TSS techniques. Our results suggest that the concomitant posteromedial pullout suture may have no clinical advantage in the conventional pullout repairs for the patients with MMPRTs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100771035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100771035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.013
DO - 10.1016/j.jos.2020.11.013
M3 - Article
C2 - 33581924
AN - SCOPUS:85100771035
SN - 0949-2658
JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Science
ER -