TY - GEN
T1 - Multi-vector feature space based on pseudo-Euclidean space and oblique basis for similarity searches of images
AU - Yamane, Yasuo
AU - Hoshiai, Tadashi
AU - Tsuda, Hiroshi
AU - Katayama, Kaoru
AU - Ohta, Manabu
AU - Ishikawa, Hiroshi
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Investigators have tried to increase the precision of similarity searches of images by using distance functions that reflect the similarity of features. When the quadratic-form distance is used, however, dissimilar images can be judged to be similar. We therefore propose that the similarity of images be evaluated using a measure of distance in a multi-vector feature space based on pseudo-Euclidean space and an oblique basis (MVPO). In this space an image is represented by a set of vectors each of which represents each feature. And we propose a distance (called D-distance) between two sets of vectors. Roughly speaking, it is the distance between solids.Another representative distance used in similarity searches is the Earth Mover's Distance (EMD). It can be formalized using MVPO, and that explains well why EMD outperforms quad-ratic-form distance. The main difference between EMD and D-distance is that EMD is based on partial matching and D-distance is based on total matching.We also discuss performance issues of MPVO and D-distance to address practical use of them.
AB - Investigators have tried to increase the precision of similarity searches of images by using distance functions that reflect the similarity of features. When the quadratic-form distance is used, however, dissimilar images can be judged to be similar. We therefore propose that the similarity of images be evaluated using a measure of distance in a multi-vector feature space based on pseudo-Euclidean space and an oblique basis (MVPO). In this space an image is represented by a set of vectors each of which represents each feature. And we propose a distance (called D-distance) between two sets of vectors. Roughly speaking, it is the distance between solids.Another representative distance used in similarity searches is the Earth Mover's Distance (EMD). It can be formalized using MVPO, and that explains well why EMD outperforms quad-ratic-form distance. The main difference between EMD and D-distance is that EMD is based on partial matching and D-distance is based on total matching.We also discuss performance issues of MPVO and D-distance to address practical use of them.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77952978645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77952978645&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/1039470.1039479
DO - 10.1145/1039470.1039479
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:77952978645
SN - 1581139179
SN - 9781581139174
T3 - ACM International Conference Proceeding Series
SP - 27
EP - 34
BT - Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Computer Vision Meets Databases, CVDB 2004
T2 - 1st International Workshop on Computer Vision Meets Databases, CVDB 2004
Y2 - 13 June 2004 through 13 June 2004
ER -