TY - JOUR
T1 - Mutations in Both KRAS and BRAF May Contribute to the Methylator Phenotype in Colon Cancer
AU - Nagasaka, Takeshi
AU - Koi, Minoru
AU - Kloor, Matthias
AU - Gebert, Johannes
AU - Vilkin, Alex
AU - Nishida, Naoshi
AU - Shin, Sung Kwan
AU - Sasamoto, Hiromi
AU - Tanaka, Noriaki
AU - Matsubara, Nagahide
AU - Boland, C. Richard
AU - Goel, Ajay
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by grants R01 CA72851 and R01 CA98572 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (to C.R.B.), and funds from the Baylor Research Institute.
PY - 2008/6
Y1 - 2008/6
N2 - Background & Aims: Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) often associate with epigenetic silencing of hMLH1 and an activating mutation in the BRAF gene. However, the current CIMP criteria are ambiguous and often result in an underestimation of CIMP frequencies in CRCs. Because BRAF and KRAS belong to same signaling pathway, we hypothesized that not only mutations in BRAF but mutant KRAS may also associate with CIMP in CRC. Methods: We determined the methylation status in a panel of 14 markers (7 canonical CIMP-related loci and 7 new loci), microsatellite instability status, and BRAF/KRAS mutations in a collection of 487 colorectal tissues that included both sporadic and Lynch syndrome patients. Results: Methylation analysis of 7 CIMP-related markers revealed that the mean number of methylated loci was highest in BRAF-mutated CRCs (3.6) vs KRAS-mutated (1.2, P < .0001) or BRAF/KRAS wild-type tumors (0.7, P < .0001). However, analyses with 7 additional markers showed that the mean number of methylated loci in BRAF mutant tumors (4.4) was the same as in KRAS mutant CRCs (4.3, P = .8610). Although sporadic microsatellite instability high tumors had the highest average number of methylated markers (8.4), surprisingly, Lynch syndrome CRCs also demonstrated frequent methylation (5.1). Conclusions: CIMP in CRC may result from activating mutations in either BRAF or KRAS, and the inclusion of additional methylation markers that correlate with mutant KRAS may help clarify CIMP in future studies. Additionally, aberrant DNA methylation is a common event not only in sporadic CRC but also in Lynch syndrome CRCs.
AB - Background & Aims: Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) often associate with epigenetic silencing of hMLH1 and an activating mutation in the BRAF gene. However, the current CIMP criteria are ambiguous and often result in an underestimation of CIMP frequencies in CRCs. Because BRAF and KRAS belong to same signaling pathway, we hypothesized that not only mutations in BRAF but mutant KRAS may also associate with CIMP in CRC. Methods: We determined the methylation status in a panel of 14 markers (7 canonical CIMP-related loci and 7 new loci), microsatellite instability status, and BRAF/KRAS mutations in a collection of 487 colorectal tissues that included both sporadic and Lynch syndrome patients. Results: Methylation analysis of 7 CIMP-related markers revealed that the mean number of methylated loci was highest in BRAF-mutated CRCs (3.6) vs KRAS-mutated (1.2, P < .0001) or BRAF/KRAS wild-type tumors (0.7, P < .0001). However, analyses with 7 additional markers showed that the mean number of methylated loci in BRAF mutant tumors (4.4) was the same as in KRAS mutant CRCs (4.3, P = .8610). Although sporadic microsatellite instability high tumors had the highest average number of methylated markers (8.4), surprisingly, Lynch syndrome CRCs also demonstrated frequent methylation (5.1). Conclusions: CIMP in CRC may result from activating mutations in either BRAF or KRAS, and the inclusion of additional methylation markers that correlate with mutant KRAS may help clarify CIMP in future studies. Additionally, aberrant DNA methylation is a common event not only in sporadic CRC but also in Lynch syndrome CRCs.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=44849132638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=44849132638&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.094
DO - 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.02.094
M3 - Article
C2 - 18435933
AN - SCOPUS:44849132638
SN - 0016-5085
VL - 134
SP - 1950-1960.e1
JO - Gastroenterology
JF - Gastroenterology
IS - 7
ER -