TY - JOUR
T1 - Natural selection increases female fitness by reversing the exaggeration of a male sexually selected trait
AU - Okada, Kensuke
AU - Katsuki, Masako
AU - Sharma, Manmohan D.
AU - Kiyose, Katsuya
AU - Seko, Tomokazu
AU - Okada, Yasukazu
AU - Wilson, Alastair J.
AU - Hosken, David J.
N1 - Funding Information:
We especially thank Takahisa Miyatake for generously supplying the predators we used from his stocks. We also thank Stuart Bearhop, Sasha Dall and Dave Hodgson for discussion. D.J.H. was supported by the Leverhulme Trust (RF-2015-001). K.O. Y.O were supported by grants from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI 18K0641700 (K.O.), 18H04815,19H04913 (Y.O.), 21H02540 (Y.O. and K.O.)) and M.K. was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (19J40100).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s).
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Theory shows how sexual selection can exaggerate male traits beyond naturally selected optima and also how natural selection can ultimately halt trait elaboration. Empirical evidence supports this theory, but to our knowledge, there have been no experimental evolution studies directly testing this logic, and little examination of possible associated effects on female fitness. Here we use experimental evolution of replicate populations of broad-horned flour beetles to test for effects of sex-specific predation on an exaggerated sexually selected male trait (the mandibles), while also testing for effects on female lifetime reproductive success. We find that populations subjected to male-specific predation evolve smaller sexually selected mandibles and this indirectly increases female fitness, seemingly through intersexual genetic correlations we document. Predation solely on females has no effects. Our findings support fundamental theory, but also reveal unforseen outcomes—the indirect effect on females—when natural selection targets sex-limited sexually selected characters.
AB - Theory shows how sexual selection can exaggerate male traits beyond naturally selected optima and also how natural selection can ultimately halt trait elaboration. Empirical evidence supports this theory, but to our knowledge, there have been no experimental evolution studies directly testing this logic, and little examination of possible associated effects on female fitness. Here we use experimental evolution of replicate populations of broad-horned flour beetles to test for effects of sex-specific predation on an exaggerated sexually selected male trait (the mandibles), while also testing for effects on female lifetime reproductive success. We find that populations subjected to male-specific predation evolve smaller sexually selected mandibles and this indirectly increases female fitness, seemingly through intersexual genetic correlations we document. Predation solely on females has no effects. Our findings support fundamental theory, but also reveal unforseen outcomes—the indirect effect on females—when natural selection targets sex-limited sexually selected characters.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85107685833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85107685833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41467-021-23804-7
DO - 10.1038/s41467-021-23804-7
M3 - Article
C2 - 34103535
AN - SCOPUS:85107685833
SN - 2041-1723
VL - 12
JO - Nature Communications
JF - Nature Communications
IS - 1
M1 - 3420
ER -