TY - JOUR
T1 - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without concurrent hormone therapy in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer
T2 - Nacedrandomized multicenter phase II trial
AU - Sugiu, Kumi
AU - Iwamoto, Takayuki
AU - Kelly, Catherine M.
AU - Watanabe, Naoki
AU - Motoki, Takayuki
AU - Itoh, Mitsuya
AU - Ohtani, Shoichiro
AU - Higaki, Kenji
AU - Imada, Takako
AU - Yuasa, Takeshi
AU - Omori, Masako
AU - Sonobe, Hiroshi
AU - Fujiwara, Toshiyoshi
AU - Matsuoka, Junji
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 by Okayama University Medical School.
PY - 2015
Y1 - 2015
N2 - Although in the neoadjuvant setting for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers, chemotherapy or hormone therapy alone does not result in satisfactory tumor response, it is unknown whether concurrent chemo-endocrine therapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in clinical outcomes. We conducted a randomized phase II trial to test the responses of ER-positive patients to concurrent administration of chemo-endocrine therapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Women with stage II-III, ER-positive, invasive breast cancer (n=28) received paclitaxel followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (T-FEC) and were randomized to receive concurrent chemo-endocrine therapy consisting of goserelin administered subcutaneously for premenopausal women or an aromatase inhibitor for postmenopausal women. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant therapy. Twenty-eight patients were randomized. There were no significant differences in pCR rate between the concurrent group (12.5%; 2/16) and the chemotherapy alone group (8.3%; 1/12). Tumor size after therapy was significantly reduced in the concurrent therapy group (/>=0.035), but not in the chemotherapy-alone group (/>=0.622). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent hormone therapy provided no significant improvement in pCR rate in ER-positive breast cancers. These preliminary results should be followed up by further studies.
AB - Although in the neoadjuvant setting for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancers, chemotherapy or hormone therapy alone does not result in satisfactory tumor response, it is unknown whether concurrent chemo-endocrine therapy is superior to chemotherapy alone in clinical outcomes. We conducted a randomized phase II trial to test the responses of ER-positive patients to concurrent administration of chemo-endocrine therapy in the neoadjuvant setting. Women with stage II-III, ER-positive, invasive breast cancer (n=28) received paclitaxel followed by fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (T-FEC) and were randomized to receive concurrent chemo-endocrine therapy consisting of goserelin administered subcutaneously for premenopausal women or an aromatase inhibitor for postmenopausal women. The primary endpoint was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after neoadjuvant therapy. Twenty-eight patients were randomized. There were no significant differences in pCR rate between the concurrent group (12.5%; 2/16) and the chemotherapy alone group (8.3%; 1/12). Tumor size after therapy was significantly reduced in the concurrent therapy group (/>=0.035), but not in the chemotherapy-alone group (/>=0.622). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent hormone therapy provided no significant improvement in pCR rate in ER-positive breast cancers. These preliminary results should be followed up by further studies.
KW - Breast cancer
KW - Concurrent hormone therapy
KW - Estrogen receptor positive
KW - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
KW - Tumor response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947942572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947942572&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 26490026
AN - SCOPUS:84947942572
SN - 0386-300X
VL - 69
SP - 291
EP - 299
JO - Acta Medica Okayama
JF - Acta Medica Okayama
IS - 5
ER -