TY - JOUR
T1 - Non-cholera Vibrio infections in Southeast Asia
T2 - A systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Muzembo, Basilua Andre
AU - Kitahara, Kei
AU - Hayashi, Chisato
AU - Mashino, Sonoe
AU - Honda, Junko
AU - Ohno, Ayumu
AU - Khatiwada, Januka
AU - Dutta, Shanta
AU - Miyoshi, Shin Ichi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Authors
PY - 2024/11
Y1 - 2024/11
N2 - We reviewed and analyzed the existing data on vibriosis in Southeast Asia to better understand its burden and prevalent causal agents. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE for studies published between January 2000 and April 2024. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled isolation rate of non-cholera Vibrio species. Among the 1385 retrieved studies, 22 met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and 11 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled isolation rate of non-cholera Vibrio species among diarrheal patients was 5.0 %. Most species that caused vibriosis included V. parahaemolyticus, V. mimicus, V. vulnificus, non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae, V. fluvialis, and V. alginolyticus. Pooled isolation rate of V. parahaemolyticus and non-O1 V. cholerae were 7.0, and 4.0, respectively. The prevalence of vibriosis in Southeast Asia is non-negligible. Public health strategies should prioritize enhanced surveillance, and clinicians should consider vibriosis in diarrheal patients with seafood consumption history.
AB - We reviewed and analyzed the existing data on vibriosis in Southeast Asia to better understand its burden and prevalent causal agents. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE for studies published between January 2000 and April 2024. A random-effects meta-analysis was used to estimate the pooled isolation rate of non-cholera Vibrio species. Among the 1385 retrieved studies, 22 met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review and 11 were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled isolation rate of non-cholera Vibrio species among diarrheal patients was 5.0 %. Most species that caused vibriosis included V. parahaemolyticus, V. mimicus, V. vulnificus, non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae, V. fluvialis, and V. alginolyticus. Pooled isolation rate of V. parahaemolyticus and non-O1 V. cholerae were 7.0, and 4.0, respectively. The prevalence of vibriosis in Southeast Asia is non-negligible. Public health strategies should prioritize enhanced surveillance, and clinicians should consider vibriosis in diarrheal patients with seafood consumption history.
KW - Gastroenteritis
KW - Seafood
KW - Vibrio mimicus
KW - Vibrio parahaemolyticus
KW - Vibrio vulnificus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206948668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85206948668&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102564
DO - 10.1016/j.jiph.2024.102564
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39437593
AN - SCOPUS:85206948668
SN - 1876-0341
VL - 17
JO - Journal of Infection and Public Health
JF - Journal of Infection and Public Health
IS - 11
M1 - 102564
ER -
