TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing multiple acquisition planning CT for prostate cancer IMRT
AU - Tanabe, Yoshinori
AU - Ishida, Takayuki
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IOP Publishing Ltd.
PY - 2019/3/25
Y1 - 2019/3/25
N2 - This study evaluated the feasibility of an optimized multiple acquisition planning computed tomography (MPCT) approach, along with daily cone-beam computed tomography (daily CBCT), for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. We used MPCT to calculate the three-dimensional (3D) displacement error between the pelvic bone and a matching fiducial marker and grouped these error values by whether they were ≤1, 1-2, or ≥3 mm. The 3D displacement errors of MPCT and daily CBCT images were then compared. Correlations between the 3D displacement error values obtained for MPCT and differences between the errors of MPCT were analyzed. Furthermore, the proportions of 3D displacement error values between MPCT and daily CBCT that exceeded 1, 3, and 5 mm were compared among three groups stratified by MPCT 3D displacement error values of ≤1, 1-2, or ≥3 mm. In a correlation analysis of the 3D displacement error values of MPCT and daily CBCT, a significant difference was observed when MPCT groups with 3D displacement errors ≥3 mm were compared (p < 0.0001). The proportions of 3D displacement errors between MPCT and daily CBCT ≥ 3 mm were 13.5%, 27.6%, and 74.5% for the <1 mm, 1-2 mm, and ≥3 mm groups, respectively. Systematic errors during treatment can be attributed to the relationship between the pelvic bone and random shifts in the prostate between each planning MPCT (>3 mm) image. To avoid these errors, optimal planning CT can be estimated by selecting CT images with the smallest 3D displacement error.
AB - This study evaluated the feasibility of an optimized multiple acquisition planning computed tomography (MPCT) approach, along with daily cone-beam computed tomography (daily CBCT), for intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer. We used MPCT to calculate the three-dimensional (3D) displacement error between the pelvic bone and a matching fiducial marker and grouped these error values by whether they were ≤1, 1-2, or ≥3 mm. The 3D displacement errors of MPCT and daily CBCT images were then compared. Correlations between the 3D displacement error values obtained for MPCT and differences between the errors of MPCT were analyzed. Furthermore, the proportions of 3D displacement error values between MPCT and daily CBCT that exceeded 1, 3, and 5 mm were compared among three groups stratified by MPCT 3D displacement error values of ≤1, 1-2, or ≥3 mm. In a correlation analysis of the 3D displacement error values of MPCT and daily CBCT, a significant difference was observed when MPCT groups with 3D displacement errors ≥3 mm were compared (p < 0.0001). The proportions of 3D displacement errors between MPCT and daily CBCT ≥ 3 mm were 13.5%, 27.6%, and 74.5% for the <1 mm, 1-2 mm, and ≥3 mm groups, respectively. Systematic errors during treatment can be attributed to the relationship between the pelvic bone and random shifts in the prostate between each planning MPCT (>3 mm) image. To avoid these errors, optimal planning CT can be estimated by selecting CT images with the smallest 3D displacement error.
KW - adaptive radiotherapy
KW - IGRT
KW - prostate IMRT
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85065319361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85065319361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1088/2057-1976/ab0dc7
DO - 10.1088/2057-1976/ab0dc7
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85065319361
SN - 2057-1976
VL - 5
JO - Biomedical Physics and Engineering Express
JF - Biomedical Physics and Engineering Express
IS - 3
M1 - 035011
ER -