TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcome of surgical treatment for metastatic vertebra bone tumor in advanced lung cancer
AU - Fukuhara, Akiko
AU - Masago, Katsuhiro
AU - Neo, Masashi
AU - Fujibayashi, Shunsuke
AU - Fujita, Shiro
AU - Hatachi, Yukimasa
AU - Irisa, Kaoru
AU - Sakamori, Yuichi
AU - Togashi, Yosuke
AU - Kim, Young Hak
AU - Mio, Tadashi
AU - Mishima, Michiaki
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - Background: Spinal metastases of patients with advanced stage lung cancer are an important target for palliative therapy, because their incidence is high, and they often cause severe symptoms and worsen the quality of life. Surgery is one of the most effective treatment options, but the indication of surgery is unclear as the procedure is invasive and patients with spinal metastasis have a rather short life expectancy. Furthermore, there have been few studies that have focused on lung cancer with poor prognosis. Methods: We reviewed all of the cases of lung cancer from January 1999 to July 2007 in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Japan. Thirteen patients with metastatic spinal tumor of lung cancer underwent surgery, and all of them had a poor performance status score (3 or 4). Results: Neurological improvement by at least 1 Frankel grade was seen in 10 of 14 cases (71%). Improvement of the movement capacity was noted in 9 of 14 cases (64%), and pain improvement was noted in 12 of 14 (86%). Median postoperative survival was 5 months (1-25 months). In particular, the group with a good postoperative performance status score (0-2) was shown to have a better median postoperative survival of 13 months. Conclusions: Surgical treatment for symptomatic metastatic spinal tumor of lung cancer can improve quality of life in a substantially high percentage of patients. Surgery should be considered even if preoperative performance status is poor.
AB - Background: Spinal metastases of patients with advanced stage lung cancer are an important target for palliative therapy, because their incidence is high, and they often cause severe symptoms and worsen the quality of life. Surgery is one of the most effective treatment options, but the indication of surgery is unclear as the procedure is invasive and patients with spinal metastasis have a rather short life expectancy. Furthermore, there have been few studies that have focused on lung cancer with poor prognosis. Methods: We reviewed all of the cases of lung cancer from January 1999 to July 2007 in the Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kyoto University Hospital, Japan. Thirteen patients with metastatic spinal tumor of lung cancer underwent surgery, and all of them had a poor performance status score (3 or 4). Results: Neurological improvement by at least 1 Frankel grade was seen in 10 of 14 cases (71%). Improvement of the movement capacity was noted in 9 of 14 cases (64%), and pain improvement was noted in 12 of 14 (86%). Median postoperative survival was 5 months (1-25 months). In particular, the group with a good postoperative performance status score (0-2) was shown to have a better median postoperative survival of 13 months. Conclusions: Surgical treatment for symptomatic metastatic spinal tumor of lung cancer can improve quality of life in a substantially high percentage of patients. Surgery should be considered even if preoperative performance status is poor.
KW - Lung cancer
KW - Metastatic vertebra bone tumor
KW - Surgical treatment
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77958536510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77958536510&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1159/000299385
DO - 10.1159/000299385
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:77958536510
SN - 1662-6575
VL - 3
SP - 63
EP - 71
JO - Case Reports in Oncology
JF - Case Reports in Oncology
IS - 1
ER -