TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms
T2 - Prospective, multicenter, cohort trial
AU - Kobayashi, Nozomu
AU - Takeuchi, Yoji
AU - Ohata, Ken
AU - Igarashi, Masahiro
AU - Yamada, Masayoshi
AU - Kodashima, Shinya
AU - Hotta, Kinichi
AU - Harada, Keita
AU - Ikematsu, Hiroaki
AU - Uraoka, Toshio
AU - Sakamoto, Naoto
AU - Doyama, Hisashi
AU - Abe, Takashi
AU - Katagiri, Atsushi
AU - Hori, Shinichiro
AU - Michida, Tomoki
AU - Yamaguchi, Takehito
AU - Fukuzawa, Masakatsu
AU - Kiriyama, Shinsuke
AU - Fukase, Kazutoshi
AU - Murakami, Yoshitaka
AU - Ishikawa, Hideki
AU - Saito, Yutaka
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (21‐25, 29‐A‐13, 2020‐A‐12).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Objectives: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the gold standard for the treatment of noninvasive large colorectal lesions, despite challenges associated with nonlifting lesions and a high rate of local recurrence. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers the possibility of overcoming these EMR limitations. However, a higher risk of complications and longer procedure time prevented its dissemination. As ESD now provides more stable results because of standardized techniques compared with those used earlier, this study aimed to quantify the rates of en bloc and curative resections, as well as ESD complications, in the present situation. Methods: A multicenter, large-scale, prospective cohort trial of ESD was conducted at 20 institutions in Japan. Consecutive patients scheduled for ESD were enrolled from February 2013 to January 2015. Results: ESD was performed for 1883 patients (1965 lesions). The mean procedure time was 80.6 min; en bloc and curative resections were achieved in 1759 (97.0%) and 1640 (90.4%) lesions, respectively, in epithelial lesions ≥20 mm. Intra- and postprocedural perforations occurred in 51 (2.6%) and 12 (0.6%) lesions, respectively, and emergency surgery for adverse events was performed in nine patients (0.5%). Conclusions: This trial conducted after the standardization of the ESD technique throughout Japan revealed a higher curability, shorter procedure time, and lower risk of complications than those reported previously. Considering that the target lesions of ESD are more advanced than those of EMR, ESD can be a first-line treatment for large colorectal lesions with acceptable risk and procedure time. (Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN000010136).
AB - Objectives: Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is the gold standard for the treatment of noninvasive large colorectal lesions, despite challenges associated with nonlifting lesions and a high rate of local recurrence. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) offers the possibility of overcoming these EMR limitations. However, a higher risk of complications and longer procedure time prevented its dissemination. As ESD now provides more stable results because of standardized techniques compared with those used earlier, this study aimed to quantify the rates of en bloc and curative resections, as well as ESD complications, in the present situation. Methods: A multicenter, large-scale, prospective cohort trial of ESD was conducted at 20 institutions in Japan. Consecutive patients scheduled for ESD were enrolled from February 2013 to January 2015. Results: ESD was performed for 1883 patients (1965 lesions). The mean procedure time was 80.6 min; en bloc and curative resections were achieved in 1759 (97.0%) and 1640 (90.4%) lesions, respectively, in epithelial lesions ≥20 mm. Intra- and postprocedural perforations occurred in 51 (2.6%) and 12 (0.6%) lesions, respectively, and emergency surgery for adverse events was performed in nine patients (0.5%). Conclusions: This trial conducted after the standardization of the ESD technique throughout Japan revealed a higher curability, shorter procedure time, and lower risk of complications than those reported previously. Considering that the target lesions of ESD are more advanced than those of EMR, ESD can be a first-line treatment for large colorectal lesions with acceptable risk and procedure time. (Clinical Trial Registration: UMIN000010136).
KW - colonoscopy
KW - colorectal cancer
KW - colorectal neoplasia
KW - endoscopic mucosal resection
KW - endoscopic submucosal dissection
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124524508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85124524508&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/den.14223
DO - 10.1111/den.14223
M3 - Article
C2 - 34963034
AN - SCOPUS:85124524508
SN - 0915-5635
JO - Digestive Endoscopy
JF - Digestive Endoscopy
ER -