TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomies by a single surgeon alternating operating position
AU - Hasegawa, Yasuhisa
AU - Matsuzaki, Shinji
AU - Murata, Daiki
AU - Ueno, Takeshi
AU - Miyamoto, Katsutoshi
AU - Kuru, Yuko
AU - Iwane, Kyosuke
AU - Kanaoka, Ryuhei
AU - Yanai, Hiroyuki
AU - Mita, Koji
AU - Mizutani, Masami
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Editorial Board of Acta Urologica Japonica. All rights reserved.
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - The clinical outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) was retrospectively investigated taking into consideration the surgeon s position during the procedure. The study cohort included 184 consecutive patients who had undergone L R P performed by a single surgeon from February 2013 to July 2018. During the study period, the surgeon stood alternately on either the left or right side of the patient. The D' Amico risk classification was low, intermediate and high in 26 (14.1%), 45 (24.5%) and 113 (61.4%) patients, respectively. Mean surgical duration was 203.5 minutes and mean estimated blood loss was 437.6 ml. Nerve sparing (NS) was implemented in 82 (44. 6%) patients. The mean period of having an indwelling urethral catheter was 5. 0 days. Perioperative Clavien-Dindo degree > Ilia complications occurred in three (1.6%) patients. Except for cases with presurgical hormonal treatment, surgical margins were positive in 41 (22.3%) patients, among whom 23 (17.4%) had pT2 disease. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 81.4%, and 84.8% of patients regained urinary continence at 12 months after surgery. Where the surgeon stood during L R P was not associated with significant differences in any parameter. However, the margin positive rate was higher on the side away from where the surgeon stood than the side closer to the surgeon (70.7% vs 29.3%). In conclusion, the position of the surgeon during L R P does not influence the outcome.
AB - The clinical outcome of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) was retrospectively investigated taking into consideration the surgeon s position during the procedure. The study cohort included 184 consecutive patients who had undergone L R P performed by a single surgeon from February 2013 to July 2018. During the study period, the surgeon stood alternately on either the left or right side of the patient. The D' Amico risk classification was low, intermediate and high in 26 (14.1%), 45 (24.5%) and 113 (61.4%) patients, respectively. Mean surgical duration was 203.5 minutes and mean estimated blood loss was 437.6 ml. Nerve sparing (NS) was implemented in 82 (44. 6%) patients. The mean period of having an indwelling urethral catheter was 5. 0 days. Perioperative Clavien-Dindo degree > Ilia complications occurred in three (1.6%) patients. Except for cases with presurgical hormonal treatment, surgical margins were positive in 41 (22.3%) patients, among whom 23 (17.4%) had pT2 disease. The 5-year biochemical recurrence-free survival rate was 81.4%, and 84.8% of patients regained urinary continence at 12 months after surgery. Where the surgeon stood during L R P was not associated with significant differences in any parameter. However, the margin positive rate was higher on the side away from where the surgeon stood than the side closer to the surgeon (70.7% vs 29.3%). In conclusion, the position of the surgeon during L R P does not influence the outcome.
KW - Laparoscopic prostatectomy
KW - Surgeon's standing position
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090319500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090319500&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14989/ActaUrolJap_66_8_251
DO - 10.14989/ActaUrolJap_66_8_251
M3 - Article
C2 - 32882121
AN - SCOPUS:85090319500
SN - 0018-1994
VL - 66
SP - 251
EP - 257
JO - Acta Urologica Japonica
JF - Acta Urologica Japonica
IS - 8
ER -