Outcomes of ultra-high-pressure balloon angioplasty for congenital heart disease in single-center experience

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Angioplasty using ultra-high-pressure (UHP) balloons may successfully treat stenotic lesions refractory to high-pressure dilation. The use of UHP balloons in patients with congenital heart disease is mostly for dilation of the pulmonary artery, and there have been few reports on the effectiveness and safety of balloons for other sites. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of the ultra-high-pressure balloon angioplasty (UHP-BA) for stenotic lesions in patients with congenital heart disease between January 2020 and December 2022 at Okayama University Hospital. A total of 78 UHP-BAs were performed in 44 patients, with a median age of 6.6 years and a median weight of 17.6 kg. The balloon types used in the UHP-BAs were Yoroi® and Conquest®. UHP-BA performed 39 procedures for the pulmonary artery (PA), 24 for fenestration, 8 for SVC, 4 for shunt, and three for others. The lesion-specific acute procedural success rates for PA, Fontan fenestration, SVC, and shunt were 77%, 75%, 88%, and 75%, respectively. A complication of UHP-BA occurred in 3.8% (3/78). Two of the three patients had pulmonary hemorrhage, and the remaining patients had pulmonary artery embolization due to the migration of a thrombus. There were no fatal complications. Balloon dilation with UHP balloons was safe and effective not only for pulmonary artery stenotic lesions but also for SVC, Fontan fenestration, shunt, and other dilation sites in patients with congenital heart disease.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere003281
JournalHeart and Vessels
DOIs
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 2025

Keywords

  • Balloon angioplasty
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Ultra-high-pressure balloon

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Outcomes of ultra-high-pressure balloon angioplasty for congenital heart disease in single-center experience'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this