TY - JOUR
T1 - Phase II study of intraperitoneal carboplatin with intravenous paclitaxel in patients with suboptimal residual epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer
T2 - A Sankai Gynecology Cancer Study Group Study
AU - Fujiwara, Keiichi
AU - Nagao, Shoji
AU - Kigawa, Junzo
AU - Noma, Jun
AU - Akamatsu, Nobuo
AU - Miyagi, Yasunari
AU - Numa, Fumitaka
AU - Okada, Makoto
AU - Aotani, Eriko
PY - 2009/7
Y1 - 2009/7
N2 - Purpose: To assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of 2 treatment modalities: intraperitoneal carboplatin combined with intravenous (IV) paclitaxel. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were those with epithelial ovarian carcinoma or primary peritoneal carcinoma stages II to IV who underwent initial surgery and had a residual tumor size of 2 cm or larger. Patients received IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 followed by intraperitoneal carboplatin AUC6. The primary end point was a response. Secondary end points were toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled, and 24 patients were eligible for assessment. The response rate was 83.3% (95% CI, 62.6%Y95.3%; Table 4). The median progressionfree survival was 25 months. The median overall survival had not been reached. Incidences of grade (G) 3/4 hematological toxicities were absolute neutrophil count, 96%; hemoglobin, 29%; and thrombocytopenia, 16%. Nonhematological toxicities included G2 liver function, 4%; G3 sensory neuropathy, 8%; and G3 myalgia and arthralgia, 4%. Conclusions: Intraperitoneal administration of carboplatin combined with IV paclitaxel was well tolerated and showed satisfactory response in the patients with bulky residual tumor. Large-scale phase III trial comparing with IV carboplatin is warranted in this patient population.
AB - Purpose: To assess the antitumor efficacy and safety of 2 treatment modalities: intraperitoneal carboplatin combined with intravenous (IV) paclitaxel. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients were those with epithelial ovarian carcinoma or primary peritoneal carcinoma stages II to IV who underwent initial surgery and had a residual tumor size of 2 cm or larger. Patients received IV paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2 followed by intraperitoneal carboplatin AUC6. The primary end point was a response. Secondary end points were toxicity, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Results: Twenty-six patients were enrolled, and 24 patients were eligible for assessment. The response rate was 83.3% (95% CI, 62.6%Y95.3%; Table 4). The median progressionfree survival was 25 months. The median overall survival had not been reached. Incidences of grade (G) 3/4 hematological toxicities were absolute neutrophil count, 96%; hemoglobin, 29%; and thrombocytopenia, 16%. Nonhematological toxicities included G2 liver function, 4%; G3 sensory neuropathy, 8%; and G3 myalgia and arthralgia, 4%. Conclusions: Intraperitoneal administration of carboplatin combined with IV paclitaxel was well tolerated and showed satisfactory response in the patients with bulky residual tumor. Large-scale phase III trial comparing with IV carboplatin is warranted in this patient population.
KW - Carboplatin
KW - Intraperitoneal chemotherapy
KW - Ovarian cancer
KW - Phase II study
KW - Suboptimal residual disease
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=69449108435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=69449108435&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a29dfe
DO - 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a29dfe
M3 - Article
C2 - 19574769
AN - SCOPUS:69449108435
SN - 1048-891X
VL - 19
SP - 834
EP - 837
JO - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
JF - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
IS - 5
ER -