TY - JOUR
T1 - Post-transplant outcomes of standard and extended criteria donation after circulatory death donor lungs categorized by donation after brain death lung criteria
AU - Tanaka, Shin
AU - Campo-Cañaveral De La Cruz, Jose Luis
AU - Barturen, Mariana Gil
AU - Carrasco, Silvana Crowley
AU - Román, Alejandra Romero
AU - León, María Trujillo Sánchez de
AU - Mejía, Lucas Hoyos
AU - Gómez, Jose Manuel Naranjo
AU - Peláez, Mar Córdoba
AU - Calle, Álvaro Sánchez
AU - Redondo, Marina Pérez
AU - Fadul, Christian García
AU - Ugarte, Andrés Varela de
AU - De-Antonio, David Gómez
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - Objectives: Most transplant centres use donation after brain death (DBD) criteria to assess the quality of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) lungs. However, research on the relationship between DBD extended criteria and cDCD lung transplantation outcomes is limited. We investigated the outcomes of using DBD extended criteria donor organs in cDCD lung transplantation, compared to the standard criteria cDCD lung transplantation. Methods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive cDCD lung referrals to Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda from June 2013 to December 2019 was undertaken. Donors were divided into standard and extended criteria groups. Early outcomes after lung transplant were compared between these groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: Thirty out of 91 cDCD donor lung offers were accepted for transplantation, of which 11 were from standard criteria donors and 19 were extended criteria donors. The baseline characteristics of the 2 recipient groups were similar. There were no differences in the rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 h after lung transplantation (21% vs 18%), duration of mechanical ventilation (48 h vs 36 h), total intensive care unit stay (10 days vs 7 days) and 1-year survival (89% vs 90%). Conclusions: Carefully selecting cDCD lungs from outside the standard acceptability criteria may expand the existing donor pool with no detrimental effects on lung transplantation outcomes.
AB - Objectives: Most transplant centres use donation after brain death (DBD) criteria to assess the quality of controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD) lungs. However, research on the relationship between DBD extended criteria and cDCD lung transplantation outcomes is limited. We investigated the outcomes of using DBD extended criteria donor organs in cDCD lung transplantation, compared to the standard criteria cDCD lung transplantation. Methods: A retrospective chart review of consecutive cDCD lung referrals to Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda from June 2013 to December 2019 was undertaken. Donors were divided into standard and extended criteria groups. Early outcomes after lung transplant were compared between these groups using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Results: Thirty out of 91 cDCD donor lung offers were accepted for transplantation, of which 11 were from standard criteria donors and 19 were extended criteria donors. The baseline characteristics of the 2 recipient groups were similar. There were no differences in the rates of grade 3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 h after lung transplantation (21% vs 18%), duration of mechanical ventilation (48 h vs 36 h), total intensive care unit stay (10 days vs 7 days) and 1-year survival (89% vs 90%). Conclusions: Carefully selecting cDCD lungs from outside the standard acceptability criteria may expand the existing donor pool with no detrimental effects on lung transplantation outcomes.
KW - Controlled donation after circulatory death
KW - Extended lung donor
KW - Lung transplantation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116578824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85116578824&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/ejcts/ezab121
DO - 10.1093/ejcts/ezab121
M3 - Article
C2 - 33693567
AN - SCOPUS:85116578824
SN - 1010-7940
VL - 60
SP - 590
EP - 597
JO - European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
JF - European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
IS - 3
ER -