TY - JOUR
T1 - Precautionary Principle and the Optimal Timing of Environmental Policy Under Ambiguity
AU - Asano, Takao
N1 - Funding Information:
Acknowledgments I would like to appreciate two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions that have improved this paper substantially. I would like to thank Cees Withagen (Associate Editor) for comments and suggestions on this paper. I would like to thank Hiroyuki Ozaki, Koichi Futagami, Youichiro Higashi, Akihisa Shibata and Hajime Sugeta for their advice and discussions on this work. I am also grateful to Takeshi Ebina and Rieko Ishii for comments and suggestions on this paper. I thank seminar participants at Osaka University, Tohoku University, Kyoto University, University of Tokyo, and Kwansei Gakuin University. Financial support from MEXT (Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research), Toyo University (Special Research), and the Zengin Foundation for Studies on Economics and Finance is greatly acknowledged
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - I consider a problem in environmental policy design in which I focus on stock pollutants. In particular, I consider stock pollutants that cause severe damage on the environment and do not depreciate at all once they are released into the atmosphere and the ocean. The purposes of this paper are: (1) to provide an economic foundation for environmental policies based on the precautionary principle and the 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and (2) to show that this optimal timing rule has a reservation property. Furthermore, I analyze the effect of an increase in ambiguity on the optimal timing of adopting some environmental policy, and show that an increase in ambiguity decreases the optimal timing of adopting the environmental policy.
AB - I consider a problem in environmental policy design in which I focus on stock pollutants. In particular, I consider stock pollutants that cause severe damage on the environment and do not depreciate at all once they are released into the atmosphere and the ocean. The purposes of this paper are: (1) to provide an economic foundation for environmental policies based on the precautionary principle and the 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and (2) to show that this optimal timing rule has a reservation property. Furthermore, I analyze the effect of an increase in ambiguity on the optimal timing of adopting some environmental policy, and show that an increase in ambiguity decreases the optimal timing of adopting the environmental policy.
KW - Ambiguity
KW - Environmental policy
KW - Knightian uncertainty
KW - Non-expected utilities
KW - Precautionary principle
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84755161482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84755161482&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10640-010-9370-9
DO - 10.1007/s10640-010-9370-9
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84755161482
SN - 0924-6460
VL - 47
SP - 173
EP - 196
JO - Environmental and Resource Economics
JF - Environmental and Resource Economics
IS - 2
ER -