TY - JOUR
T1 - Predictive factors of rectal toxicity after permanent iodine-125 seed implantation
T2 - Prospective cohort study in 2339 patients
AU - Katayama, Norihisa
AU - Yorozu, Atsunori
AU - Maruo, Shinichiro
AU - Kojima, Shinsuke
AU - Ohashi, Toshio
AU - Tanaka, Nobumichi
AU - Kikuchi, Takashi
AU - Higashide, Satoshi
AU - Saito, Shiro
AU - Dokiya, Takushi
AU - Fukushima, Masanori
AU - Yamanaka, Hidetoshi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Brachytherapy Society
PY - 2016/11/1
Y1 - 2016/11/1
N2 - Purpose To evaluate the incidence and the associated factors of rectal toxicity in patients with prostate cancer undergoing permanent seed implantation (PI) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in a nationwide prospective cohort study in Japan (J-POPS) during the first 2 years. Methods and Materials A total of 2,339 subjects were available for the analyses. Rectal toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Results The 3-year cumulative incidence for grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was 2.88%, 1.76%, and 6.53% in all subjects, PI group and EBRT combination therapy group, respectively. On multivariate analysis, among all subjects, grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was associated with rectal volumes receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (R100; p < 0.0001) and EBRT combination therapy (p = 0.0066). R100 in the PI group (p = 0.0254), and R100 (p = 0.0011) and interactive planning (p = 0.0267) in the EBRT combination therapy group were also associated with grade ≥2 toxicity. The 3-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was 3.80% and 1.37% for R100 ≥ 1 mL and R100 < 1 mL, respectively, in the PI group (p = 0.0068), and 14.09% and 5.52% for R100 ≥ 1 mL and R100 < 1 mL, respectively, in the EBRT combination therapy group (p = 0.0070). Conclusions Rectal toxicity was relatively rare in this study compared with previous reports. For Japanese prostate cancer patients, R100 < 1 mL in both PI and EBRT combination therapy groups and interactive planning in EBRT combination therapy group may be effective in decreasing the incidence of rectal toxicity.
AB - Purpose To evaluate the incidence and the associated factors of rectal toxicity in patients with prostate cancer undergoing permanent seed implantation (PI) with or without external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in a nationwide prospective cohort study in Japan (J-POPS) during the first 2 years. Methods and Materials A total of 2,339 subjects were available for the analyses. Rectal toxicity was evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0. Results The 3-year cumulative incidence for grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was 2.88%, 1.76%, and 6.53% in all subjects, PI group and EBRT combination therapy group, respectively. On multivariate analysis, among all subjects, grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was associated with rectal volumes receiving 100% of the prescribed dose (R100; p < 0.0001) and EBRT combination therapy (p = 0.0066). R100 in the PI group (p = 0.0254), and R100 (p = 0.0011) and interactive planning (p = 0.0267) in the EBRT combination therapy group were also associated with grade ≥2 toxicity. The 3-year cumulative incidence of grade ≥2 rectal toxicity was 3.80% and 1.37% for R100 ≥ 1 mL and R100 < 1 mL, respectively, in the PI group (p = 0.0068), and 14.09% and 5.52% for R100 ≥ 1 mL and R100 < 1 mL, respectively, in the EBRT combination therapy group (p = 0.0070). Conclusions Rectal toxicity was relatively rare in this study compared with previous reports. For Japanese prostate cancer patients, R100 < 1 mL in both PI and EBRT combination therapy groups and interactive planning in EBRT combination therapy group may be effective in decreasing the incidence of rectal toxicity.
KW - Brachytherapy
KW - Dose-volume histogram parameters
KW - External beam radiation therapy
KW - Interactive planning
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Rectal toxicity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992162448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992162448&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.09.001
DO - 10.1016/j.brachy.2016.09.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 27720311
AN - SCOPUS:84992162448
SN - 1538-4721
VL - 15
SP - 736
EP - 745
JO - Brachytherapy
JF - Brachytherapy
IS - 6
ER -