Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. Part IV: The effect of impression material on glutaraldehyde solution

Hidenobu Tomita; Shogo Minagi; Yasumasa Akagawa; Hiromichi Tsuru

doi:10.1016/0022-3913(90)90131-U

Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. Part IV: The effect of impression material on glutaraldehyde solution

Hidenobu Tomita, Shogo Minagi, Yasumasa Akagawa, Hiromichi Tsuru

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Immersion of dental impressions in 2% glutaraldehyde has been shown to be an effective disinfection procedure for viral contamination. This study compared the effect of immersing impression materials on the concentrations of glutaraldehyde. Contamination with saliva slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Irreversible hydrocolloid impression material markedly decreased the concentration of glutaraldehyde, whereas the immersion of silicone rubber impression material only slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Attention should be paid to the concentration of glutaraldehyde solution when irreversible hydrocolloid impression material is immersed in the disinfectant.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	573-577
Number of pages	5
Journal	The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Volume	64
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90131-U
Publication status	Published - Nov 1990
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Oral Surgery

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/0022-3913(90)90131-U

Cite this

@article{fffaf124307043b283853007bc581a06,

title = "Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. Part IV: The effect of impression material on glutaraldehyde solution",

abstract = "Immersion of dental impressions in 2% glutaraldehyde has been shown to be an effective disinfection procedure for viral contamination. This study compared the effect of immersing impression materials on the concentrations of glutaraldehyde. Contamination with saliva slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Irreversible hydrocolloid impression material markedly decreased the concentration of glutaraldehyde, whereas the immersion of silicone rubber impression material only slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Attention should be paid to the concentration of glutaraldehyde solution when irreversible hydrocolloid impression material is immersed in the disinfectant.",

author = "Hidenobu Tomita and Shogo Minagi and Yasumasa Akagawa and Hiromichi Tsuru",

year = "1990",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/0022-3913(90)90131-U",

language = "English",

volume = "64",

pages = "573--577",

journal = "The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry",

issn = "0022-3913",

publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. Part IV

T2 - The effect of impression material on glutaraldehyde solution

AU - Tomita, Hidenobu

AU - Minagi, Shogo

AU - Akagawa, Yasumasa

AU - Tsuru, Hiromichi

PY - 1990/11

Y1 - 1990/11

N2 - Immersion of dental impressions in 2% glutaraldehyde has been shown to be an effective disinfection procedure for viral contamination. This study compared the effect of immersing impression materials on the concentrations of glutaraldehyde. Contamination with saliva slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Irreversible hydrocolloid impression material markedly decreased the concentration of glutaraldehyde, whereas the immersion of silicone rubber impression material only slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Attention should be paid to the concentration of glutaraldehyde solution when irreversible hydrocolloid impression material is immersed in the disinfectant.

AB - Immersion of dental impressions in 2% glutaraldehyde has been shown to be an effective disinfection procedure for viral contamination. This study compared the effect of immersing impression materials on the concentrations of glutaraldehyde. Contamination with saliva slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Irreversible hydrocolloid impression material markedly decreased the concentration of glutaraldehyde, whereas the immersion of silicone rubber impression material only slightly affected the concentration of glutaraldehyde. Attention should be paid to the concentration of glutaraldehyde solution when irreversible hydrocolloid impression material is immersed in the disinfectant.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0025515338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0025515338&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90131-U

DO - 10.1016/0022-3913(90)90131-U

M3 - Article

C2 - 2128640

AN - SCOPUS:0025515338

SN - 0022-3913

VL - 64

SP - 573

EP - 577

JO - The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

JF - The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

IS - 5

ER -

Prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and hepatitis B. Part IV: The effect of impression material on glutaraldehyde solution

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this