TY - JOUR
T1 - Prognostic model of pulmonary adenocarcinoma by expression profiling of eight genes as determined by quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction
AU - Endoh, Hideki
AU - Tomida, Shuta
AU - Yatabe, Yasushi
AU - Konishi, Hiroyuki
AU - Osada, Hirotaka
AU - Tajima, Kohei
AU - Kuwano, Hiroyuki
AU - Takahashi, Takashi
AU - Mitsudomi, Tetsuya
PY - 2004/12/1
Y1 - 2004/12/1
N2 - Purpose: Recently, several expression-profiling experiments have shown that adenocarcinoma can be classified into subgroups that also reflect patient survival. In this study, we examined the expression patterns of 44 genes selected by these studies to test whether their expression patterns were relevant to prognosis in our cohort as well, and to create a prognostic model applicable to clinical practice. Patients and Methods: Expression levels were determined in 85 adenocarcinoma patients by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Cluster analysis was performed, and a prognostic model was created by the proportional hazards model using a stepwise method. Results: Hierarchical clustering divided the cases into three major groups, and group B, comprising 21 cases, had significantly poor survival (P = .0297). Next, we tried to identify a smaller number of genes of particular predictive value, and eight genes (PTK7, CIT, SCNN1A, PGES, ERO1L, ZWINT, and two ESTs) were selected. We then calculated a risk index that was defined as a linear combination of gene expression values weighted by their estimated regression coefficients. The risk index was a significant independent prognostic factor (P = .0021) by multivariate analysis. Furthermore, the robustness of this model was confirmed using an independent set of 21 patients (P = .0085). Conclusion: By analyzing a reasonably small number of genes, patients with adenocarcinoma could be stratified according to their prognosis. The prognostic model could be applicable to future decisions concerning treatment.
AB - Purpose: Recently, several expression-profiling experiments have shown that adenocarcinoma can be classified into subgroups that also reflect patient survival. In this study, we examined the expression patterns of 44 genes selected by these studies to test whether their expression patterns were relevant to prognosis in our cohort as well, and to create a prognostic model applicable to clinical practice. Patients and Methods: Expression levels were determined in 85 adenocarcinoma patients by quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Cluster analysis was performed, and a prognostic model was created by the proportional hazards model using a stepwise method. Results: Hierarchical clustering divided the cases into three major groups, and group B, comprising 21 cases, had significantly poor survival (P = .0297). Next, we tried to identify a smaller number of genes of particular predictive value, and eight genes (PTK7, CIT, SCNN1A, PGES, ERO1L, ZWINT, and two ESTs) were selected. We then calculated a risk index that was defined as a linear combination of gene expression values weighted by their estimated regression coefficients. The risk index was a significant independent prognostic factor (P = .0021) by multivariate analysis. Furthermore, the robustness of this model was confirmed using an independent set of 21 patients (P = .0085). Conclusion: By analyzing a reasonably small number of genes, patients with adenocarcinoma could be stratified according to their prognosis. The prognostic model could be applicable to future decisions concerning treatment.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1542608359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1542608359&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.109
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2004.04.109
M3 - Article
C2 - 14990636
AN - SCOPUS:1542608359
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 22
SP - 811
EP - 819
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 5
ER -