TY - JOUR
T1 - Recognizing taste
T2 - Coding patterns along the neural axis in mammals
AU - Ohla, Kathrin
AU - Yoshida, Ryusuke
AU - Roper, Stephen D.
AU - Di Lorenzo, Patricia M.
AU - Victor, Jonathan D.
AU - Boughter, John D.
AU - Fletcher, Max
AU - Katz, Donald B.
AU - Chaudhari, Nirupa
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors acknowledge the following sources of support: Federal Ministry of Education and Research [BMBF; 01EA1408A-G to K.O.], National Institutes of Health [NIH; R01DC014420 and R21DC012746 to S.D.R. and N.C., R01DC007630 to S.D.R., R01DC016833 to J.B. and M.F., R01DC006914 to P.M.D. and J.D.V., R01DC00945, R01DC007708, and R01DC006666 to D.B.K., R01DC006308 to N.C.], and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JSPS; KAKENHI JP26462815 and 18K09507 to R.Y.]. The authors thank Iryna Ruda for help with the artwork in Figure 1.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2019.
PY - 2019/4/15
Y1 - 2019/4/15
N2 - The gustatory system encodes information about chemical identity, nutritional value, and concentration of sensory stimuli before transmitting the signal from taste buds to central neurons that process and transform the signal. Deciphering the coding logic for taste quality requires examining responses at each level along the neural axis-from peripheral sensory organs to gustatory cortex. From the earliest single-fiber recordings, it was clear that some afferent neurons respond uniquely and others to stimuli of multiple qualities. There is frequently a “best stimulus” for a given neuron, leading to the suggestion that taste exhibits “labeled line coding.” In the extreme, a strict “labeled line” requires neurons and pathways dedicated to single qualities (e.g., sweet, bitter, etc.). At the other end of the spectrum, “across-fiber,” “combinatorial,” or “ensemble” coding requires minimal specific information to be imparted by a single neuron. Instead, taste quality information is encoded by simultaneous activity in ensembles of afferent fibers. Further, “temporal coding” models have proposed that certain features of taste quality may be embedded in the cadence of impulse activity. Taste receptor proteins are often expressed in nonoverlapping sets of cells in taste buds apparently supporting “labeled lines.”Yet, taste buds include both narrowly and broadly tuned cells. As gustatory signals proceed to the hindbrain and on to higher centers, coding becomes more distributed and temporal patterns of activity become important. Here, we present the conundrum of taste coding in the light of current electrophysiological and imaging techniques at several levels of the gustatory processing pathway.
AB - The gustatory system encodes information about chemical identity, nutritional value, and concentration of sensory stimuli before transmitting the signal from taste buds to central neurons that process and transform the signal. Deciphering the coding logic for taste quality requires examining responses at each level along the neural axis-from peripheral sensory organs to gustatory cortex. From the earliest single-fiber recordings, it was clear that some afferent neurons respond uniquely and others to stimuli of multiple qualities. There is frequently a “best stimulus” for a given neuron, leading to the suggestion that taste exhibits “labeled line coding.” In the extreme, a strict “labeled line” requires neurons and pathways dedicated to single qualities (e.g., sweet, bitter, etc.). At the other end of the spectrum, “across-fiber,” “combinatorial,” or “ensemble” coding requires minimal specific information to be imparted by a single neuron. Instead, taste quality information is encoded by simultaneous activity in ensembles of afferent fibers. Further, “temporal coding” models have proposed that certain features of taste quality may be embedded in the cadence of impulse activity. Taste receptor proteins are often expressed in nonoverlapping sets of cells in taste buds apparently supporting “labeled lines.”Yet, taste buds include both narrowly and broadly tuned cells. As gustatory signals proceed to the hindbrain and on to higher centers, coding becomes more distributed and temporal patterns of activity become important. Here, we present the conundrum of taste coding in the light of current electrophysiological and imaging techniques at several levels of the gustatory processing pathway.
KW - Geniculate ganglion
KW - Gustatory coding
KW - Gustatory cortex
KW - Nucleus of solitary tract
KW - Taste bud
KW - Taste quality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064886514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064886514&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/chemse/bjz013
DO - 10.1093/chemse/bjz013
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30788507
AN - SCOPUS:85064886514
SN - 0379-864X
VL - 44
SP - 237
EP - 247
JO - Chemical Senses
JF - Chemical Senses
IS - 4
ER -