TY - JOUR
T1 - Retrospective study of induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer
AU - Asakage, Takahiro
AU - Ando, Mizuo
AU - Yoshida, Masafumi
AU - Saito, Yuki
AU - Omura, Go
AU - Yamasoba, Tatsuya
PY - 2015/10
Y1 - 2015/10
N2 - We carried out this study to clarify the treatment outcomes and problems associated with induction chemotherapy (using taxotere, cisplatin and 5-FU [TPF therapy]) and chemoradiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. The data of 44 patients receiving their initial treatment for oropharyngeal cancer (including 2, 9 and 33 patients with stage II, stage III and stage IV disease, respectively, and 31, 8 and 3 patients with side wall, front wall and upper wall (soft palate and uvula) involvement) were examined. Of the 44 patients, 33 received induction chemotherapy and 11 received chemoradiotherapy. The feasibility, incidence of neutropenia, response rate, and 3 year disease-specific survival rate in the induction chemotherapy group vs. chemoradiotherapy group were 70%, 88%, 82% and 73%, respectively, vs. 63%, 91%, 82% and 55%, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the 3-year disease-specific survival rate was seen between the p16-positive and p16-negative patients in the induction chemotherapy group: while the rate was 100% in the p16-positive patients, it was only 51% in the p16-negative patients (p = 0.004). Of the patients undergoing chemoradio-therapy, 3 developed mandibular osteomyelitis, which was considered as one of the important problems associated with this therapy.
AB - We carried out this study to clarify the treatment outcomes and problems associated with induction chemotherapy (using taxotere, cisplatin and 5-FU [TPF therapy]) and chemoradiotherapy in patients with oropharyngeal cancer. The data of 44 patients receiving their initial treatment for oropharyngeal cancer (including 2, 9 and 33 patients with stage II, stage III and stage IV disease, respectively, and 31, 8 and 3 patients with side wall, front wall and upper wall (soft palate and uvula) involvement) were examined. Of the 44 patients, 33 received induction chemotherapy and 11 received chemoradiotherapy. The feasibility, incidence of neutropenia, response rate, and 3 year disease-specific survival rate in the induction chemotherapy group vs. chemoradiotherapy group were 70%, 88%, 82% and 73%, respectively, vs. 63%, 91%, 82% and 55%, respectively. A statistically significant difference in the 3-year disease-specific survival rate was seen between the p16-positive and p16-negative patients in the induction chemotherapy group: while the rate was 100% in the p16-positive patients, it was only 51% in the p16-negative patients (p = 0.004). Of the patients undergoing chemoradio-therapy, 3 developed mandibular osteomyelitis, which was considered as one of the important problems associated with this therapy.
KW - Human papilloma virus
KW - Induction chemotherapy
KW - Oropharyngeal cancer
KW - P16
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948649684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948649684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3950/jibiinkoka.118.1226
DO - 10.3950/jibiinkoka.118.1226
M3 - Article
C2 - 26727822
AN - SCOPUS:84948649684
SN - 0030-6622
VL - 118
SP - 1226
EP - 1232
JO - Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan
JF - Journal of Otolaryngology of Japan
IS - 10
ER -