TY - JOUR
T1 - Ruxolitinib in steroid-refractory acute graft-vs-host disease
T2 - Japanese subgroup analysis of the randomized REACH2 trial
AU - Teshima, Takanori
AU - Onishi, Yasushi
AU - Kato, Koji
AU - Taniguchi, Shuichi
AU - Miyamura, Koichi
AU - Fukushima, Kentaro
AU - Kato, Jun
AU - Ishikawa, Takayuki
AU - Doki, Noriko
AU - Nakamae, Hirohisa
AU - Maeda, Yoshinobu
AU - Inamoto, Yoshihiro
AU - Okada, Masaya
AU - Maki, Akio
AU - Shimada, Fumika
AU - Tajima, Takeshi
AU - Wroclawska, Monika
AU - Zeiser, Robert
AU - Onizuka, Makoto
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japan and other countries. Nearly one-third of patients do not respond to standard systemic steroid therapy and no standard second-line treatment has been established in Japan. We report efficacy and safety findings of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) from a subgroup analysis of the international, phase 3 REACH2 study in Japanese patients with steroid-refractory aGvHD. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at day 28. Overall, 9 patients received ruxolitinib and 21 received BAT. The ORR at day 28 (88.9% vs 52.4%) and durable ORR at day 56 (66.7% vs 28.6%) were higher with ruxolitinib versus BAT. The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 12.5% with ruxolitinib and 18.2% with BAT. The median failure-free survival was longer with ruxolitinib versus BAT (2.73 vs 1.25 months). The most common adverse events up to day 28 in the ruxolitinib and BAT groups were anemia (55.6% vs 19.0%) and thrombocytopenia (44.4% vs 4.8%, respectively). Ruxolitinib showed better efficacy outcomes and a consistent safety profile compared with BAT in the Japanese subgroup, and the findings were consistent with overall study results.
AB - Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Japan and other countries. Nearly one-third of patients do not respond to standard systemic steroid therapy and no standard second-line treatment has been established in Japan. We report efficacy and safety findings of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy (BAT) from a subgroup analysis of the international, phase 3 REACH2 study in Japanese patients with steroid-refractory aGvHD. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at day 28. Overall, 9 patients received ruxolitinib and 21 received BAT. The ORR at day 28 (88.9% vs 52.4%) and durable ORR at day 56 (66.7% vs 28.6%) were higher with ruxolitinib versus BAT. The estimated cumulative incidence of loss of response at 6 months was 12.5% with ruxolitinib and 18.2% with BAT. The median failure-free survival was longer with ruxolitinib versus BAT (2.73 vs 1.25 months). The most common adverse events up to day 28 in the ruxolitinib and BAT groups were anemia (55.6% vs 19.0%) and thrombocytopenia (44.4% vs 4.8%, respectively). Ruxolitinib showed better efficacy outcomes and a consistent safety profile compared with BAT in the Japanese subgroup, and the findings were consistent with overall study results.
KW - Acute graft-versus-host disease
KW - JAK inhibitor
KW - Japanese
KW - Ruxolitinib
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85194477779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85194477779&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s12185-024-03772-6
DO - 10.1007/s12185-024-03772-6
M3 - Article
C2 - 38796666
AN - SCOPUS:85194477779
SN - 0925-5710
VL - 120
SP - 106
EP - 116
JO - International journal of hematology
JF - International journal of hematology
IS - 1
ER -